Author: Scott Horton

Scott has been practicing Labor & Employment law in New York for almost 20 years. He has represented over 400 employers and authored 100s of articles and presentations and wrote the book New York Management Law: The Practical Guide to Employment Law for Business Owners and Managers. Nothing on this blog can be considered legal advice. If you want legal advice, you need to retain an attorney.

Warehouse Worker Protection Act

New York Warehouse Worker Protection Act Amended

The New York Warehouse Worker Protection Act limits employers’ ability to monitor warehouse employees’ productivity using quotas. Covered employers must notify employees in writing of all quotas against which they’re measured and the potential consequences of not meeting them. This new law temporarily took effect on February 19, 2023. As a result of chapter amendments, its implementation will now be delayed until June 19, 2023, with significant changes.

Covered Workplaces

Employers are subject to the Warehouse Worker Protection Act if they employ either:

  • 100 or more employees at a single warehouse distribution center; or
  • 1,000 or more employees at one or more warehouse distribution centers in the State.

“Warehouse distribution center” is defined by reference to applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. Establishments falling under the following NAICS codes are covered:

Employees exempt from New York minimum wage and overtime requirements are not counted in determining coverage. Even if subject to quotas, the provisions of the Warehouse Worker Protection Act don’t apply to them. Drivers and couriers are also excluded from coverage.

“Quotas”

The Warehouse Worker Protection Act defines “quota” as “a work standard” which:

  • an employee is assigned or required to perform: at a specified productivity speed; or a quantified number of tasks, or to handle or produce a quantified amount of material, within a defined time period; or under which the employee may suffer an adverse employment action if they fail to complete the performance standard; or
  • an employee’s actions are categorized between time performing tasks and not performing tasks, and the employee’s failure to complete a task performance standard or recommendation may have an adverse impact on the employee’s continued employment or the conditions of such employment.

Notice of Quotas

By July 19, 2023 (or, if later, upon hire), covered employers must provide each employee a written description of each quota to which the employee is subject. The description must include:

  • quantified number of tasks to be performed or materials to be produced or handled,
  • specified time period, and
  • any potential adverse employment actions that could result from failure to meet the quota.

If the employer changes any quota, it must provide an updated written description of each quota within two business days of the change.

The written description must be provided in English and the employee’s primary language.

Whenever an employer disciplines an employee for not meeting a quota, it must provide the employee with the applicable quota.

Additional Provisions

The Warehouse Worker Protection Act includes additional parameters related to employee quotas. These restrictions generally prohibit employers from implementing quotas that prevent compliance with meal or rest periods or bathroom use, including reasonable travel time to and from bathroom facilities.

Current employees have the right to request a copy of the written description of their quotas. If a current or former employee believes they have been disciplined for failing to meet a quota or that meeting a quota caused a violation of their right to a meal, rest period, or use of the bathroom, they have the right to request and receive all of the following:

  • written descriptions of each quota to which the employee is subject;
  • the most recent 90 days of the employee’s own work speed data; and
  • the aggregate work speed data for similar employees at the same establishment for the same time period.

Employers must also maintain quota records for three years sufficient to ensure compliance with requests for data.

Companies must provide the requested information “as soon as practicable, but no later than fourteen calendar days from the date of the request.” They may not retaliate against employees for requesting quota information or making a complaint alleging a violation of the Act.

Note that the Warehouse Worker Protection Act confirms that it does not require any employer to use quotas or to create/preserve data if it doesn’t monitor employee performance based on quotas.

Warehouse Employer Action Required

The Warehouse Worker Protection Act could apply to employers across numerous industries, including transportation, logistics, and a broad array of wholesale businesses. If your warehouse operations are large enough to qualify, you must plan to either provide the requisite quota information to employees or decide not to apply productivity quotas. Warehouses that continue to use quotas must be particularly careful to identify all possible consequences to an employee who doesn’t meet their quota and include them in the required written description. Not listing a form of discipline may prevent the employer from implementing it later.

 

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

HR Compliance

Tackling HR Compliance for Your Small Business

As an employment lawyer, I spend much of my time communicating with excellent human resources professionals. HR compliance is an underappreciated function in many organizations, though not necessarily by choice. Here are some general observations on how companies can struggle with their human resources practices and when hiring a dedicated HR professional for your growing small business may be a good idea.

Limitations on Good HR Compliance

Human resources compliance refers to the process of ensuring that a company adheres to all relevant laws, regulations, and standards when it comes to managing its employees. Some of the key factors that can impair HR compliance within a company include:

  1. Lack of awareness or understanding of the relevant laws and regulations: Companies may not be aware of all the laws and regulations that apply to their HR practices or may not understand how to comply with these requirements.
  2. Limited resources: Companies may not have the resources or staff required to fully implement HR compliance programs, including the development and implementation of policies and procedures, training and education, and ongoing monitoring and reporting.
  3. Inadequate systems and processes: Companies may not have well-developed systems and processes in place to support HR compliance, including procedures for tracking and reporting incidents, responding to complaints, and conducting investigations.
  4. Resistance to change: Companies may resist change, especially if they have been operating in a particular way for a long time. This resistance may create delays in adopting new HR compliance practices or changing established processes.

How Can You Improve Your HR Compliance?

To overcome these challenges, companies can take several steps to improve their HR compliance, including:

  1. Conducting a comprehensive review of their HR practices and policies to identify potential risks or areas for improvement.
  2. Establishing clear policies and procedures to ensure that all HR practices comply with the relevant laws and regulations.
  3. Providing training and education to employees on the relevant laws and regulations and the company’s policies and procedures.
  4. Implementing systems and processes to track and report incidents and respond to complaints and investigations.
  5. Involving employees in improving HR compliance by seeking their feedback and suggestions and involving them, as appropriate, in the development and implementation of new policies and procedures.

Hiring Your First HR Professional

As your company grows, you must ensure that you have the right resources and support to manage your workforce effectively. One of the critical decisions you’ll need to make as you grow is when and how to hire your first HR professional.

How Many Employees?

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer to when it’s time to hire your first HR professional, as it will depend on the size and needs of your company. There is no specific number of employees a company must have before hiring a dedicated HR staff member. However, as a company grows and the number of employees increases, the need for HR support also increases, because HR plays a critical role in managing and supporting a company’s most valuable asset, its people.

For smaller companies with fewer than 50 employees, it may be reasonable to assign HR responsibilities to a manager or administrative staff member with other duties. However, as the company grows and the number of employees increases, the need for specialized HR support also increases, and it may be more cost-effective to hire a dedicated HR professional.

Ultimately, the decision to hire an HR professional should be based on the company’s specific needs and resources, as well as its plans for future growth.

Additional Factors

Here are a few key indicators that it may be time to bring in an HR professional:

  1. Your company is growing rapidly: As your company grows, so does the complexity of managing your workforce. You may struggle to keep up with increasing HR-related tasks and responsibilities.
  2. You’re spending too much time on HR tasks: If you’re spending an increasing amount of time on HR-related tasks, such as recruiting and onboarding new employees, it may be time to bring in an HR professional to help lighten the load.
  3. Your company is facing HR challenges: If your company is facing personnel difficulties, such as high turnover, disputes with employees, or legal compliance issues, you may need to bring in an HR professional who can help you resolve these challenges and prevent them from recurring in the future.

How to Hire Your First HR Professional

Once you’ve decided that it’s time to hire your first HR professional, consider taking the following steps to ensure that you find the right candidate:

  1. Define the role: Clearly define the role and responsibilities of the HR professional you’re looking to hire. This step will help you ensure that you understand clearly what you need from the person you bring on board and then attract suitable candidates for that position.
  2. Create a job description: Write a comprehensive job description that includes the key responsibilities, qualifications, and experience that you’re looking for in a candidate. This will help you attract the right candidates and enable them to understand what the position demands.
  3. Utilize your network: Leverage your professional network to find potential candidates. Ask for referrals from colleagues, business partners, and friends, and consider reaching out to HR professionals with whom you’ve worked in the past.
  4. Offer competitive compensation: Be sure to offer a competitive compensation package that includes a salary, benefits, and any other perks that are important to you and candidates at the level you’re seeking.

Don’t Stop Improving

Whether you’ve hired the first or tenth member of your human resources department, there’s always room to improve your company’s HR compliance. You can review and repeat many of the steps above to continue to make strides in this area. Of course, the applicable laws and regulations of the workplace will also continue to develop. So make sure your human resources team subscribes to our newsletter to receive important updates in this area.

January 2023 NLRB Union Election

January 2023 NLRB Union Election Filings

In January 2023, NLRB union election filings continued their recent climb. But you must look beyond the raw numbers to see this reality. As has been the case for the past year, union organizing at Starbucks stores still complicates the analysis.

January 2023 Union Election Petitions

Overall, the National Labor Relations Board received 150 “RC” petitions seeking union representation in January 2023. While that is much lower than the 169 filed last January, the decrease is all attributable to the maturation of the Starbucks unionization campaign.

In January 2022, there were 35 petitions seeking elections involving Starbucks stores. This year that number has declined to only 7–an unsurprising result, given the volume of stores that already had elections last year.

Setting aside the Starbucks petitions, the 143 other union elections sought this January represent a 6% increase over the 134 non-Starbucks election petitions in January 2022.

With or without the Starbucks cases, the January 2023 RC filings nearly match the 149 petitions from January 2020 and significantly exceed the 114 January filings in both 2018 and 2019, as shown in the graph below.

Non-Starbucks NLRB Petitions Filed in January 2018-2023

FY 2023 to Date

The NLRB’s current fiscal year began on October 1, 2022. In the first four months of FY ’23, there were 582 union election petitions filed that didn’t involve Starbucks–a 13.5% increase from the same “post-COVID” period in FY ’22 and a nearly 5% increase from the same pre-COVID period in FY ’20.

Non-Starbucks NLRB Petitions Filed Oct-Jan FY 2018-2023

California and Texas Lead the Way

Most U.S. states see very few NLRB union election petitions filed in a single month. California and New York–large, relatively labor-friendly states–typically account for among the most RC petitions, as they did in January 2023. But it’s more notable that Texas continues to experience an upward trend in union elections.

California

With 15 non-Starbucks RC filings, California saw a 36% year-over-year increase from 11 petitions in January 2022. But 15 is well below the 23 January California RC petitions in 2020 and only back to the January average between 2018-2019.

Texas

Despite being the second-largest U.S. state by both land and population, Texas usually only sees a few RC petitions each month. Lately, that seems to be changing. Even excluding Starbucks, eight union election petitions were filed in Texas in January 2023. By comparison, only one RC petition was filed in the state in both January 2021 and January 2022, and 5 each in the month in 2019 and 2020.

With small sample sizes, it’s hard to reach dramatic conclusions about a potential trend toward increased union organizing in Texas. However, we can go back a little further for similar results. Between October and December 2022 (the first quarter of the NLRB’s 2023 fiscal year), 17 union election petitions (not involving Starbucks) were filed in Texas. Thus, there have been 25 such filings in the current NLRB fiscal year. During the same period in the previous fiscal years, there were only eight (FY ’22), nine (FY ’21), and 14 (FY ’20) union representation cases in Texas.

Georgia

Another southern state with an upward trend, Georgia had three non-Starbucks RC filings in January 2023. It had four total union election petitions filed in the previous five Januarys combined. There have now been 10 cases in Georgia this fiscal year, nearly as many as the 11 total union elections sought in Georgia between October and January over the previous three years.

Other Notable Gainers

Starbucks-adjusted January RC filings are also meaningfully up in:

  • D.C.: 6 in 2023 vs. 3 in 2022 and 6 total from 2018-2021
  • Illinois: 14 in 2023 vs. 11 in 2022 and no more than 9 between 2018-2021
  • Massachusetts: 6 in 2023 vs. 3 or 4 in each of the previous five years
  • Nevada: 7 in 2023 vs. 4 in 2022 and no more than 5 since 2018
  • North Carolina: 3 in 2023 vs. 3 total from 2018-2022
  • Washington: 9 in 2023 vs. 5 in 2022 and no more than 6 since 2018

Notably Down: New York & New Jersey

New York dropped from 16 to 12 January union election petitions compared to last year, matching the state’s five-year January low set in COVID-afflicted 2021.

New Jersey is another heavily unionized state that experienced a decrease in union election petitions in January 2023. Only five RC petitions were filed in the Garden State that month versus nine in both January 2022 and January 2020. (Like New York, New Jersey also experienced a large dropoff in such filings in January 2021 (only 1 case), presumably related to COVID-19 effects.)

FY 2023 Union Representation Election Results

Unions typically win about 70% of the representation elections held. Many petitions filed in Q1 FY 2023, including all of those filed in January, have not yet resulted in elections. Among those that have, unions have won about 76% of the time. Unions only won 71% of the elections held in cases filed in Q1 FY 2022. However, it may be too early to conclude that unions are winning elections more often since the data are incomplete.

 

To receive future updates and analysis on NLRB election statistics, sign up for our email newsletter.