Home » Employment Law » Discrimination » Harassment

Category: Harassment

Reviewing Your New York Anti-Harassment Policies

Reviewing Your New York Anti-Harassment Policies (Webinar Recap)

On August 24, 2023, I presented a complimentary webinar entitled “Reviewing Your New York Anti-Harassment Policies”. For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, I’m happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, I discuss:

  • Sexual Harassment Policies
  • Other Protected Characteristics
  • Best Practices
  • Legal Impact
  • Training

and much more!

All New York employers must have a written sexual harassment prevention policy. The State has recently updated its model policy, and employers should be aware of the suggested changes. You should also consider how to address other forms of harassment in your employee handbook or other policy materials. Given relatively low bars for asserting unlawful harassment in New York, it is critical that employers continue to monitor their efforts in this area.

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch “Reviewing Your New York Anti-Harassment Policies”

New York State has updated its model sexual harassment prevention policy. While employers are not required to adopt the model policy, you must meet minimum guidelines established by the State. Unfortunately, it’s not so clear exactly how to do that. In this webinar, we discuss some strategies and best practices for compliance depending on your circumstances.

Of course, employees have legal rights to be free from harassment based on other characteristics as well. What do your current policies say about racial harassment, age-based harassment, and harassment against individuals with disabilities? Make sure your policies make sense together and are up-to-date in light of periodic changes in applicable employment discrimination laws.

The webinar also includes reminders about mandatory sexual harassment training and ideas on preventing harassment, which is the only way to genuinely reduce the risk of legal liability.

Don’t Miss Our Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter to be among the first to know when registration is open for upcoming programs! And follow us on LinkedIn for even more frequent updates on important employment law issues.

Updated Model Sexual Harassment Policy

New York’s Updated Model Sexual Harassment Policy

On April 11, 2023, New York State implemented an updated model sexual harassment policy. The new policy includes several meaningful substantive additions. But a key employer concern remains unanswered. Are they required to change their policies to conform to the new model?

Sexual Harassment Policy Requirement

Since October 9, 2018, New York has required all employers in the state to maintain a written sexual harassment policy. They must also provide annual sexual harassment training to all employees.

Section 201-g of the New York Labor Law directed the Department of Labor (DOL) to consult with the Division of Human Rights (DHR) to develop a model sexual harassment prevention policy. However, the law does not specifically require employers to adopt the model policy. As an alternative, they may “establish a sexual harassment prevention policy to prevent sexual harassment that equals or exceeds the minimum standards provided by such model sexual harassment prevention policy.”

Based on the law and pre-existing guidance from the DOL, an employer’s policy must at least:

  • Prohibit sexual harassment consistent with guidance issued by the Department of Labor in consultation with the Division of Human Rights.
  • Provide examples of prohibited conduct that would constitute unlawful sexual harassment.
  • Include information concerning the federal and state statutory provisions concerning sexual harassment, remedies available to victims of sexual harassment, and a statement that there may be applicable local laws.
  • Include a complaint form.
  • Include a procedure for the timely and confidential investigation of complaints that ensures due process for all parties.
  • Inform employees of their rights of redress and all available forums for adjudicating sexual harassment complaints administratively and judicially.
  • Clearly state that sexual harassment is considered a form of employee misconduct and that sanctions will be enforced against individuals engaging in sexual harassment and against supervisory and managerial personnel who knowingly allow such behavior to continue.
  • Clearly state that retaliation against individuals who complain of sexual harassment or who testify or assist in any investigation or proceeding involving sexual harassment is unlawful.

NYS Sexual Harassment Law Has Changed

The New York Human Rights Law was amended in 2019 to change the legal standard of workplace harassment. Among the changes, employees no longer need to prove that unwelcome conduct was “severe or pervasive.” That standard remains operative under the federal employment discrimination laws. But now, under the NYS law, to avoid liability employers must show that “the harassing conduct does not rise above the level of what a reasonable victim of discrimination with the same protected characteristic would consider petty slights or trivial inconveniences.”

Updated Model Policy

The law requires the DOL and DHR to review their model policy every four years. The first review took place in 2022, resulting in the updated model sexual harassment policy released in early 2023.

Not surprisingly, the new policy aims to advise employees on a broadened scope of what the DOL and DHR view as unlawful sexual harassment. However, new additions to the model policy are not limited to those arising from intervening statutory changes.

And the DOL hasn’t clarified the extent to which employers must update their existing policies, if at all. The specific minimum guidelines listed above haven’t changed. But there’s room for interpretation regarding the requirement to “Prohibit sexual harassment consistent with guidance issued by the Department of Labor in consultation with the Division of Human Rights.”

Header text on the State’s updated model sexual harassment states, “Employers are encouraged to tailor this policy to their individual needs, though as a minimum standard, no section in this policy should be omitted.”

The updated model policy is available for download from NYS here.

Description of Sexual Harassment

Consistent with the new statutory standard for proving harassment, the updated model sexual harassment policy includes the following;

Harassment does not need to be severe or pervasive to be illegal. It can be any harassing behavior that rises above petty slights or trivial inconveniences. Every instance of harassment is unique to those experiencing it, and there is no single boundary between petty slights and harassing behavior. However, the Human Rights Law specifies that whether harassing conduct is considered petty or trivial is to be viewed from the standpoint of a reasonable victim of discrimination with the same protected characteristics.

This additional wording is obviously based on the 2019 statutory amendment. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that the original New York model sexual harassment policy didn’t mention the “severe or pervasive” standard even when that was the prevailing law.

Gender Issues

The 2019 Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA) added “gender identity or expression” as statutorily-protected characteristics under the New York Human Rights Law. Before GENDA, the DHR had already interpreted the statutory category “sex” to include gender-related characteristics. Accordingly, the original model sexual harassment policy identified sexual harassment as including harassment based on “self-identified or perceived sex, gender expression, gender identity and the status of being transgender.”

The new model policy significantly expands its focus in this area, including the following passage:

Understanding gender diversity is essential to recognizing sexual harassment because discrimination based on sex stereotypes, gender expression and perceived identity are all forms of sexual harassment. The gender spectrum is nuanced, but the three most common ways people identify are cisgender, transgender, and non-binary. A cisgender person is someone whose gender aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth. Generally, this gender will align with the binary of male or female. A transgender person is someone whose gender is different than the sex they were assigned at birth. A non-binary person does not identify exclusively as a man or a woman. They might identify as both, somewhere in between, or completely outside the gender binary. Some may identify as transgender, but not all do. Respecting an individual’s gender identity is a necessary first step in establishing a safe workplace.

Bystander Intervention

The updated model sexual harassment policy includes a new section entitled “Bystander Intervention.” In addition to restating the pre-existing requirement that supervisors and managers must report sexual harassment, the policy now encourages “any employee witnessing harassment as a bystander” to report it.

The policy lists “five standard methods of bystander intervention”:

  1. A bystander can interrupt the harassment by engaging with the individual being harassed and distracting them from the harassing behavior.
  2. A bystander who feels unsafe interrupting on their own can ask a third party to help intervene in the harassment.
  3. A bystander can record or take notes on the harassment incident to benefit a future investigation.
  4. A bystander might check in with the person who has been harassed after the incident, see how they are feeling and let them know the behavior was not ok.
  5. If a bystander feels safe, they can confront the harassers and name the behavior as inappropriate. When confronting harassment, physically assaulting an individual is never an appropriate response.

Remote Employees

The new policy also specifically adresses the proliferation of remote work stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic:

Sexual harassment can occur when employees are working remotely from home as well. Any behaviors outlined above that leave an employee feeling uncomfortable, humiliated, or unable to meet their job requirements constitute harassment even if the employee or covered individual is at home when the harassment occurs. Harassment can happen on virtual meeting platforms, in messaging apps, and after working hours between personal cell phones.

Legal Protections

New York sexual harassment policies must include information about reporting alleged sexual harassment to government agencies, including the DHR and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The new model policy includes several updates to these sections. For example, it now references a hotline introduced in 2022 that employees can call to speak with a volunteer attorney experienced in sexual harassment matters for “limited free assistance and counsel over the phone.”

Sexual Harassment Prevention Training

In addition to the new model policy, the State has also updated its model sexual harassment prevention training materials.

Like the model policy, the State’s training materials are not mandatory. But employers must provide annual training that meets certain minimum standards, which have not changed.

What Should New York Employers Do Now?

At a minimum, you should ensure that your organization has reviewed the new model sexual harassment policy (and training materials). There are some items that employers generally should update, such as the statute of limitations for filing sexual harassment claims with the DHR (which has increased from one to three years since the original model policy was issued). Other topics, including the elaboration of legal standards and gender identity principles, raise more complicated compliance questions. It is not clear whether you must adopt the new wording in these areas, since employers have some discretion in drafting their sexual harassment prevention policies. Thus, your company’s approach should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of whether you have previously adopted the model policy in its entirety or prepared your own alternative designed to satisfy at least the minimum standards.

 

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

2021 EEOC Charges

2021 EEOC Charges Show Decline in Most Categories

The number of employment discrimination claims filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission continued a steep decline in 2021. At the lowest level in at least several decades, data from the past two years suggests that COVID-19 contributed to the reduction. But a review of 2021 EEOC charges reveals some interesting trends that may be unrelated to the pandemic.

FY 2021 EEOC Charges

The latest annual data refer to the 12-month fiscal year ending September 30, 2021. The EEOC received 61,331 charges of employment discrimination during this period. The charges span several federal laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Equal Pay Act, and the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA).

More than half (56%) of the charges included a retaliation claim, often in addition to claims based on other protected characteristics.

Here is the percentage of total charges that asserted discrimination based on those other characteristics:

  • Disability – 37.2%
  • Race – 34.1%
  • Sex – 30.6%
  • Age – 21.1%
  • National Origin – 10.1%
  • Color – 5.7%
  • Religion – 3.4%
  • Equal Pay – 1.4%
  • Genetic Information – 0.4%

Totals exceed 100%, as charges can allege more than one category.

Harassment charges, which can be based on any protected characteristic, also continued to fall in FY 2021, even as a percentage of all claims. Of the total EEOC charges filed last year, 21,270 (34.7%) included a harassment claim. In 2020, 35.9% of charges included a harassment allegation.

Downward Trend

Since Democratic administrations are seen to be more employee-friendly than Republican ones, it is interesting to review these data in line with the party in control of the White House (and, correspondingly, the EEOC). Annual EEOC charges began to decline following the transition from the presidency of Barack Obama into the Trump Administration. After consistently measuring near or above 90,000 cases per year under President Obama, total EEOC charges have declined each year since Donald Trump was elected. Of course, this now includes the beginning of Democrat Joe Biden’s presidency.

EEOC Charges 2017-2021

Sexual Harassment Charges in 2021

Claims of sex-based harassment fell to 10,035, down 13.1% from the FY 2018 peak sparked by the #MeToo movement. That number includes all charges alleging harassment related to one’s sex (treating people of one sex less favorably than others). The EEOC separately tracks harassment of a sexual nature.

Charges alleging harassment of a sexual nature also fell to the lowest level in the 25 years of data reported by the EEOC. The agency received 5,581 such charges in FY 2021, down 26.6% from 2018, and 29.7% from 2010.

EEOC Sexual Harassment Charges 2017-2021

What’s Going On?

While there are many possible explanations for the decline in charges, it is hard to ignore the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic over the past two years. With less workers on-site, there may simply be fewer opportunities for employees to feel harassed. A relative labor shortage could also be a factor. If employees who think they have been terminated from their jobs for a discriminatory reason quickly find new employment, they may be less likely to file a claim against their former employer. Enhanced unemployment benefits may have also generated a similar effect.

Of course, it would be great if the decline in charges corresponds to a reduction in actual instances of harassment or other discrimination. However, the data do not readily enable an analysis of whether that may be the case.

Digging Into the 2021 EEOC Charge Statistics

What may we be able to find out from the data on 2021 EEOC charges?

All statistics used for this article are available here.

Race/Color Discrimination

The EEOC reports 20,908 charges alleging race discrimination in FY 2021. That’s easily the fewest such claims in the history of the EEOC dataset going back to 1992, representing a 41.7% drop since the peak a decade earlier in FY 2010.

EEOC Race Discrimination Charges

However, charges based on color discrimination have been increasing. In FY 2020, 5.7% of charges (3,516) included a claim of color discrimination–the highest level ever for such claims on a percentage basis. The reasonable assumption is that more employees are raising color discrimination claims instead of race discrimination. Yet, employees can claim discrimination based on both race and color. So, the increase in color discrimination claims doesn’t necessarily explain the reduction in race discrimination claims.

EEOC Color Discrimination Charges

LGBTQ+ Discrimination

EEOC charges based on sexual orientation or transgender status have also increased in the past five years. This trend may not be surprising in light of a shift in judicial acceptance that these characteristics are protected under federal employment discrimination laws. The U.S. Supreme Court only held that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and transgender status in June 2020.

LGBTQ+ Based Sex Discrimination Charges

Other Categories

Charges alleging discrimination based on sex, religion, age, and disability all declined in FY 2021 (as in 2017-2020). But the declines were roughly proportionate to the overall case volume.

Looking Ahead

The (hopeful) end of COVID-19 restrictions could affect EEOC filings next year. Likewise, Democrats will take complete policy-making control over the EEOC after the term of the next Republican on the commission expires in July 2022. This shift could lead to more aggressive enforcement of the federal employment discrimination statutes.

However, there is some room for optimism that whether due to COVID-19’s permanent impact on the workplace or other causes, harassment and discrimination are becoming less prevalent. Nonetheless, an overall trend is no solace if your company suffers the consequences of employment discrimination claims. As ever, employers should be proactive in preventing discrimination. Anti-harassment training is one viable approach. Effective hiring practices, training, and supervision are also critical.

 

To receive updates on employment law insights and developments, sign up for our email newsletter and follow Horton Law on LinkedIn.