Home » OFCCP

Tag: OFCCP

OFCCP Data Disclosure

Federal Contractors Have Short Window to Object to OFCCP Data Disclosure

On August 19, 2022, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) received a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from a journalist with the Center for Investigative Reporting. This request was for disclosure of EEO-1 Type 2 Consolidated Report data filed by federal government contractors and subcontractors between 2016-2020. The OFCCP is offering covered employers an opportunity to prevent their company’s reports from being made public. But the time available to object to the OFCCP data disclosure is limited.

Freedom of Information Act

The U.S. Freedom of Information Act allows the public to request records from federal agencies. The government must provide available records, subject to various exceptions.

FOIA Exemption 4 protects from disclosure: “trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person [that is] privileged or confidential.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).

EEO-1 Type 2 Reports

All private sector employers with 100 or more employees and federal contractors with 50 or more employees meeting certain criteria must file EEO-1 reports annually. These reports provide the federal government demographic workforce data, including data by race/ethnicity, sex, and job categories.

EEO-1 Type 2 reports pertain to employers with multiple establishments. Through these reports, employers submit annual demographic data for all U.S.-based employees across their locations.  Employers with only a single establishment typically would file the EEO-1 “Type 1” report.

The pending request FOIA request is limited to Type 2 reports. Accordingly, the OFCCP is not planning to provide data for single-establishment contractors.

Objections to OFCCP Data Disclosure

To protect trade secrets and other potentially sensitive commercial and financial information, the OFCCP is permitting contractors to file an objection to the FOIA request. After an initial deadline of September 19, 2022, the OFCCP is now accepting opt-out requests through October 19, 2022.  Subject contractors who don’t object within this time frame will be assumed to have no objections to disclosing their company’s demographic data.

The OFCCP suggests that contractors address the following questions in any objections:

  • Do you consider information from your EEO-1 Report to be a trade secret or commercial information? If yes, please explain why.
  • Do you customarily keep the requested information private or closely held? If yes, please explain what steps have been taken to protect data contained in your reports, and to whom it has been disclosed?
  • Do you contend that the government provided an express or implied assurance of confidentiality? If yes, please explain. If no, skip to the next question.
  • If you answered “no” to the previous question, were there expressed or implied indications at the time the information was submitted that the government would publicly disclose the information? If yes, please explain.
  • Do you believe that disclosure of this information could cause harm to an interest protected by Exemption 4 (such as by causing genuine harm to your economic or business interests)? If yes, please explain.

To facilitate written objections to the request, the OFCCP has created a Submitter Notice Response Portal.

Additional information for covered contractors is available through the OFCCP’s Submitter Notice Response Portal Frequently Asked Questions.

 

To receive updates on employment law insights and developments, sign up for our email newsletter and follow Horton Law on LinkedIn.

Applicant Recordkeeping Requirements

Applicant Recordkeeping for Employers

Various laws either expressly require or essentially necessitate that employers retain information about job applicants for some period of time. These applicant recordkeeping requirements arise primarily from employment discrimination statues and obligations imposed on government contractors. But good business records are vital in defense of virtually any potential legal claim.

If you’re interested in other hiring issues, watch my webinar on the Legal Risks of Social Media in Hiring.

EEOC Recordkeeping Rules

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has promulgated recordkeeping rules related to the laws it enforces. These include applicant recordkeeping.

Under the rules:

All Personnel and Employment Records made or used (including, but not limited to, requests for reasonable accommodation, application forms submitted by applicants, and records dealing with hiring, promotion, demotion, transfer, lay-off or termination, rates of pay, compensation, tenure, selection for training or apprenticeship, or other terms of employment) must be preserved for these periods:

  1. Private employers must retain such records for one year from the date of making the record or the personnel action involved, whichever occurs later, but in the case of involuntary termination of an employee, they must retain the terminated employee’s personnel or employment records for one year from the date of termination.
  2. Educational Institutions and State and Local Governments must retain such records for two years from the date of the making of the record or the personnel action involved, whichever occurs later, but in the case of involuntary termination of an employee, they must retain the terminated employee’s personnel or employment records for two years from the date of termination.

Uniform Selection Guidelines

Various federal agencies, including the EEOC, worked together to issue “Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures” in 1978. These guidelines apply generally to employers subject to Title VII (15+ employees) and federal contractors subject to Executive Order 11246’s affirmative action requirements. They cover an array of topics related to selection procedures used as the basis for any employment decision. This includes validation of employee testing procedures, for example. But also routine hiring interviews, and most everything in between.

The Uniform Selection Guidelines provide that:

“Each [employer] should maintain and have available for inspection records or other information which will disclose the impact which its tests and other selection procedures have upon employment opportunities of persons by identifiable race, sex, or ethnic group . . . in order to determine compliance with these guidelines.”

The Guidelines state that employers with 100+ employees “should maintain and have available for each job information on adverse impact of the selection process for that job and, where it is determined a selection process has an adverse impact, evidence of validity . . . .”

The Guidelines afford “Simplified record keeping for users with less than 100 employees”. These small employers need only retain records showing the:

  • number of persons hired, promoted, and terminated for each job, by sex, and where appropriate by race and national origin;
  • number of applicants for hire and promotion by sex and where appropriate by race and national origin; and
  • selection procedures utilized (either standardized or not standardized).

Obtaining the Data

The Guidelines themselves specify no particular procedure for obtaining data on applicants’ race, sex, or ethnic classifications. Other EEOC guidance allows that:

  • “Where applications are made in person, a user may maintain a log or applicant flow chart based upon visual observation, identifying the number of persons expressing an interest, by sex and by race or national origin; may in some circumstances rely upon personal knowledge of the user; or may rely upon self-identification.”
  • “Where applications are not made in person and the applicants are not personally known to the employer, self-identification may be appropriate. Wherever a self-identification form is used, the employer should advise the applicant that identification by race, sex and national origin is sought, not for employment decisions, but for record-keeping in compliance with Federal law.”

Federal Contractors

As part of their affirmative action programs, federal contractors must analyze personnel activity data. They must determine whether there are selection disparities. In connection with those requirements, regulations of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFFCP) provide that covered contractors must preserve all personnel records for at least one or two years: One year for contractors with fewer than 150 employees or maximum contract size under $150,000. Two years for contractors with 150+ employees or a contract of at least $150,000.

Federal contractors with a contract of $100,000+ and 50+ employees must also create and retain evaluations of outreach and recruitment efforts, certain comparisons regarding applicants and employees, and records related to hiring benchmarks for at least three years.

Collectively, these requirements compel covered federal contractors to identify “applicants” and preserve records and data about them. This may include data about each applicant’s race, ethnicity, sex, veteran, and disability status.

Internet Applicants

Because the Internet created new hiring processes, the OFFCP issued guidelines to define who qualifies as an “Internet Applicant.”

An “Internet Applicant” is an individual who satisfies all four of these criteria:

  • The individual submitted an expression of interest in employment through the Internet or related electronic data technologies;
  • The contractor considered the individual for employment in a particular position;
  • The individual’s expression of interest indicated that the individual possesses the basic qualifications for the position; and
  • The individual, at no point in the contractor’s selection process prior to receiving an offer of employment from the contractor, removed himself or herself from further consideration or otherwise indicated that he/she was no longer interested in the position.

Related Internet Applicant rules apply to federal contractors who accept electronic submissions for a position. If you may be subject to these applicant recordkeeping requirements, check with your legal counsel and/or affirmative action administrators to make sure you are retaining the appropriate information regarding applicants, including those who apply online.

Click here for more on legal issues related hiring through the Internet.

Statutes of Limitations

Beyond satisfying express applicant recordkeeping requirements, employers must be mindful of defending against claims by employees or unsuccessful job candidates. If the employer has not retained all records related to the hiring process, it may face obstacles in providing the validity of its process and decisions. Thus, the statutes of limitations for legal claims are a consideration in determining how long to keep these records.

The federal discrimination laws generally require an applicant or employee to file a claim within 300 days (sometimes less). However, claims of patterns or practice or continuing violation may allow a longer look back period.

State discrimination laws may have even longer statutes of limitations. For example, individuals have up to three years to bring claims under the New York State Human Rights Law.

Overall Suggestions on Applicant Recordkeeping

All employers should create and retain sufficient documentation to support their hiring decisions. Some employers will have specific minimum obligations, especially including federal contractors with affirmative action requirements.

It’s possible that employees or applicants will attempt to litigate years after the underlying decisions. Therefore, it is often prudent to retain all personnel records indefinitely. Fortunately, modern technology permits employers to keep these records at relatively low cost. Scanning and electronic storage can also enable efficient searching and recall of documents when needed.

Again, this is only a general overview of some recordkeeping requirements. An employer’s specific circumstances may warrant additional or different considerations.

For more information about legal issues related to modern hiring practices, check out this webinar on the Legal Risks of Social Media in Hiring.

 

OFFCCP Joining EEOC?

OFCCP Joining EEOC? Not So Fast

President Trump’s 2018 budget includes merging the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) into the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The underlying theory is that both agencies deal with employment discrimination and the combination would save money. There is significant opposition, however, from both employer and employee groups.

(The OFCCP and EEOC are both among the Top 9+ Government Websites for New York Employers.)

What is the OFCCP?

The OFCCP is currently housed within the Department of Labor. It was created in 1978 under President Carter to centralize enforcement of federal affirmative action requirements. The requirements apply to certain entities with federal grants or contracts. In some cases, these companies must create and maintain written affirmative action plans. The goal is to promote hiring of women, minorities, persons with disabilities, and veterans. Affirmative action does not technically permit employers to discriminate in favor of these groups at the expense of other employees. Rather, it focuses on enhancing recruiting efforts to include these populations and eliminating discrimination against these protected groups.

What is the EEOC?

The EEOC is a federal agency separate from the Department of Labor. It was created in 1965. The EEOC administers and enforces federal workplace discrimination laws, including: Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. These laws apply to all employers in the U.S. with enough employees. (Of these laws the ADEA has the highest threshold at 20 employees.)

Who Wants the OFCCP to Join the EEOC?

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has been pitching this idea to every President since Reagan in the 1980s. This group argues, “The OFCCP has become redundant. Taxpayers should not fund two separate and duplicative anti-discrimination agencies, one for federal contractors and one for all employers.”

President Trump has shown a strong desire and willingness to deregulate the federal government. So to the extent that this proposal could streamline federal oversight of employment policy, it fits within his agenda. Not everyone agrees that this would be the reality, however.

Who Doesn’t Want the OFCCP to Join the EEOC?

A lot of powerful constituencies.

Major pro-business groups are lining up against this proposal. This includes The Institute for Workplace Equality and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. They fear that this combination would cause uncertainty and unintended consequences. For example, the EEOC has broader enforcement authority and could use information obtained in affirmative compliance action to pursue anti-discrimination actions. (Read my post on Responding to Employment Discrimination Complaints.)

The National Employment Law Project, an employee rights group, and civil rights groups like the NAACP and Americans Civil Liberties Union have also expressed opposition.

What Will Happen to the OFCCP?

It’s too soon to tell, but there is a good chance it will stay where it is. At this point, the merger is only a White House proposal. Congress would have to approve it and amend existing laws to fully transfer all necessary authority to the EEOC.

With so many groups opposed from all sides, this seems like an area the Republicans facing re-election next year would want to avoid. But another aspect of the White House budget, reduced funding of the OFCCP, could perhaps garner sufficient support.

If your organization is subject to federal affirmative action requirements, check back here for updates on the status of this proposal. Or sign up for the Horton Law PLLC newsletter to receive email updates.