Home » EEOC

Tag: EEOC

2018 EEO-1

Delayed Filing for 2018 EEO-1

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has postponed the filing period for 2018 EEO-1 surveys. Employers usually must file these annual reports by March 31st. However, this year’s deadline will be May 31, 2019, as a result of the recent federal government shutdown.

Who Must File a 2018 EEO-1?

Private employers with 100+ employees must annually report employee data on race, ethnicity, and gender by occupational category.

Many federal contractors with less than 100 but more than 50 employees also must file these EEO-1 reports.

EEO-1 Data

The EEO-1 survey requires covered employers to identify the number of employees they have in various job categories based on several demographic groups.

The EEO-1 job categories are:

  • Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers
  • First/Mid-Level Officials and Managers
  • Professionals
  • Technicians
  • Sales Workers
  • Administrative Support Workers
  • Craft Workers
  • Operatives
  • Laborers and Helpers
  • Service Workers

Within these job categories, employers must provide the number of employees based on sex and race/ethnicity from among these options:

  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Black or African American
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
  • Asian
  • Native American or Alaska Native
  • Two or more races

Employers must attempt to allow employees to self-identify among these groups. If an employee declines to do so, then the employer can rely on existing employment records or observer (e.g., manager) identification to complete the survey.

The EEO-1 is a snapshot report as of a single pay period in October, November, or December. Thus, it does not necessarily reflect all individuals who worked for the company during the survey year.

Why the Delay?

The EEOC has not finalized details and instructions for the 2018 EEO-1 reports. It expects to open filing for employers in early March 2019.

For updates on the 2018 EEO-1, visit the EEOC’s website.

Not Unprecedented

EEO-1 filing was also delayed last year.

Toward the end of the Obama administration, the EEOC planned to modify the EEO-1 report to include wage and hours data beginning with reports of 2017 data. The Trump administration, however, rejected that expansion.

Though it’s not clear whether that situation alone prompted the move, the EEOC postponed the filing deadline to June 1, 2018, for 2017 data. So, barring a further postponement this year, employers have one fewer day (albeit a Saturday) to submit the 2018 EEO-1 surveys.

What Should You Do Now?

If you’re not already sure, check to determine whether your company must file a 2018 EEO-1. If you will be filing for the first time, make sure you know what data to use. You might also need to obtain employee self-identification of ethnicity. Then check back with the EEOC in early March to confirm the procedure for filing this year.

 

Want to receive updates about employment law topics of interest to employers and notification of our free webinars?

Click here to sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter.

 

EEOC 2018 Sexual Harassment Charges

EEOC: 2018 Sexual Harassment Data Even Worse

On October 31, 2018, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported final data on fiscal-year 2018 sexual harassment charges. The EEOC had issued preliminary numbers for its fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, earlier in October. The new figures show an even greater uptick in sexual harassment cases.

[Click for more on the EEOC’s preliminary 2018 sexual harassment data report.]

Final FY 2018 Sexual Harassment Statistics

The EEOC is now reporting a 13.6% increase in sexual harassment charges versus FY 2017. Based on prior-year data, this equates to approximately 7,632 sexual harassment cases filed between October 2017 and September 2018.

Initially, the EEOC reported a 12% rise in these charges.

Any meaningful increase in sexual harassment charges is notable. As shown in the chart below, there had been a consistent decline in such cases over the past decade.

EEOC Sexual Harassment Charges Chart

Ironically, the EEOC’s 2018 fiscal year began right at the beginning of the #MeToo movement. Although the statistics do not necessarily prove causation, the circumstances strongly imply a connection.

The EEOC also disclosed that hits on its sexual harassment webpage doubled over the past year.

EEOC Calls for “Holistic Approach” to Prevent Harassment

The EEOC released the updated statistics at a public meeting entitled “Revamping Workplace Culture to Prevent Harassment.” The meeting was held at the agency’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“Leadership and accountability set the tone and the expectation that harassment will not be tolerated in a workplace,” said Victoria A. Lipnic, Acting Chair. “Over the past year, we have seen far too many examples of significant gaps in both areas. Our witnesses today stressed how both leadership and accountability must also be driven throughout an organization from the line employees, to the supervisors, to the CEO, and to the Board.”

EEOC Commissioner Chai R. Feldblum co-chairs the agency’s Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace. She added that “No one element, alone, will suffice.  Instead, it takes a holistic effort that must start at the top with strong and committed leadership.”

Several witnesses representing various constituencies presented at the October 31, 2018 public meeting. These included Alejandra Valles, Secretary-Treasurer of SEIU United Service Workers West; Anne Wallestad, president and CEO of BoardSource; and Professor Christine Porath of Georgetown University.

The EEOC will also accept public comments into the record of the meeting for 15 days.

Additional information about the public meeting is available here.

An Issue We Can’t Ignore

The latest reports from the EEOC only underscore what has already become evident. Our workplaces are not yet free from sexual harassment and employees are coming forward more often.

Employers must acknowledge at least their legal obligation to prevent and redress incidents of sexual harassment. Failing to do so can have a devastating impact on your company.

 

 

For more updates on related topics of interest and to receive notice of our free informational webinars, click here to sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter.

Mental Health Leave ADA

Mental Health Leave Under the ADA

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with mental disabilities to enable them to perform the essential functions of their jobs. Leaves of absence often qualify as a reasonable accommodation. This includes allowing employees to use either accrued paid leave or unpaid mental health leave to treat or manage their conditions.

Mental Health “Disabilities”

Federal law prohibits employment discrimination based on mental disability. The ADA broadly defines disability as a “physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.” This definition also covers employees with a record of having a mental disability or a perception of having one.

Many state anti-discrimination statutes also prohibit discrimination based on mental health conditions. Definitions of “disability” may vary under state law, sometimes expanding on what conditions the ADA protects.

Mental health conditions that might qualify as disabilities under the ADA include depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), among many others.

Click here to read more about “What Is a Disability Under the ADA?”

Employee Privacy

Under the ADA, employers cannot require applicants or employees to disclose a disability, with a few exceptions. Employees may need to disclose mental disabilities when they are requesting a reasonable accommodation. Then, employers can ask for medical records describing the disability and employee limitations. All information related to employee disabilities must be kept confidential.

Requesting Mental Health Leave

Employees can request an accommodation at any time during employment. The request can be in plain language and does not have to include the term “reasonable accommodation.” Requests need not be in writing. Employees typically provide notes from their doctors. Employers may also require employees to undergo evaluation from a health care provider of their choice as long as the employer covers the cost.

The U.S.  Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) oversees the enforcement of the ADA. In guidance documents, it gives an example of a situation where a secretarial employee requests time off “because of her medical condition.” This statement is sufficient to put the employer on notice that the employee is requesting a reasonable accommodation. But the employer can ask for medical documentation to learn the specifics of the employee’s condition and limitations.

Employers do not have to grant a leave of absence every time the employee requests one. But they must determine whether the employee has a disability, whether leave is a reasonable accommodation, and whether, even if reasonable, the leave would pose an undue hardship on the employer. All of these determinations depend on the circumstances.

Click here to read more about “Reasonable Accommodations of Disability in Employment.”

Return to Work

When returning from leave, employers can require employees to undergo a medical examination to determine fitness for duty. Employees often ask for extended leave or other accommodations upon return. Employers may honor these requests. But organizations are not required to provide accommodations that would create an undue hardship on the workplace. Nor must employers permit an employee to work if doing so would pose a direct threat to anyone’s health or safety.

The EEOC gives the example of an employee returning from a leave of absence after she underwent a hospital stay and adjusted her medication. The employer may request a fitness-for-duty evaluation to ensure the employee can still perform the essential functions of the position. But the medical examination must be limited to her mental condition.

What Do the Courts Say About Mental Health Leave?

Employers must evaluate every situation carefully to determine their obligations under the ADA.

Here are just some examples of what courts have said in specific cases:

In one case, a teacher with an anxiety disorder requested an extended leave of absence as an accommodation. The court upheld the employer’s refusal to grant the leave because there was no certainty that the teacher would be able to return to work at the end of the leave

In another case, a manufacturing employee returned from leave due to severe depression. Upon return, he requested the accommodation of having no contact with co-workers or supervisors. The court upheld the employer’s determination that this accommodation was unreasonable.

These are just two among numerous cases that have resulted in litigation. Obviously, employers would prefer to avoid litigation under the ADA, whether related to mental health leave or other employee disability issues.

No Retaliation

Employers (through supervisors and co-workers) may not retaliate against employees for requesting or taking mental health leave. This includes both taking tangible job actions (e.g., firing) or making the employee’s workday miserable (e.g., harassment).

Employer Takeaways

According to the National Institute of Mental Health, about 18.5% of the United States population report having a mental health condition during the past year. Thus, mental disabilities are among the most prevalent types of disability that the ADA covers.

Managers and supervisors must accept that mental health conditions qualify for the same general protections as physical impairments. As with many disability accommodation issues, mental health leave is often not a straightforward subject. Accordingly, employers should consult with an experienced employment attorney when these issues arise.