Category: Termination

New York WARN Act

New York WARN Act

State and federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Acts require companies to provide notice before taking certain actions to reduce the size of their workforce. For employers conducting reductions in force in New York, the state law will almost always be more restrictive. Thus, complying with New York’s WARN Act will usually also satisfy the federal requirements.

[Here’s a succinct infographic on the New York WARN Act.]

Covered Employers

The New York WARN Act requires employers with at least 50 total employees to give written notice before implementing covered workforce reductions affecting at least 25 employees.

“Part-time employees” and properly classified independent contractors do not count in determining whether a WARN event will occur. However, the definition of “part-time employee” is multifaceted and likely to differ from how the company normally classifies its workers.

Timing of Notice

The New York WARN Act requires written notice 90 days before a “plant closing,”  “mass layoff,” or “relocation”. Each of those terms has a nuanced definition under the law.

WARN Notice Events

A “plant closing” occurs where an employment site (or one or more facilities or operating units within an employment site) will be shut down, and the shutdown will result in an “employment loss” for 25 or more employees during any 30-day period.*

A “mass layoff” occurs where there is to be a group reduction in force that does not result from a plant closing, but will result in an employment loss at the employment site during any 30-day period* for: (a) 250 or more employees, or (b) 25-249 employees if they make up at least 33% of the employer’s active workforce.

*Sometimes the 30-day periods referenced above extend to 90-days in determining whether WARN notices are required.

New York’s WARN Act also refers to a “relocation” situation that is not part of the federal WARN Act. In New York, a “relocation” occurs where all or substantially all of the industrial or commercial operations of an employer will be removed to a different location 50 miles or more away from the original site of operation and 25 or more employees suffer an employment loss.

An “employment loss” occurs in any of these situations: (a) employment terminations other than a discharge for cause, voluntary departure, or retirement; (b) layoffs exceeding six months; and (c) a reduction in an employee’s hours of work of more than 50% in each month of any six-month period. Hence, companies may need to issue WARN notices even if the intention is not to permanently end the employees’ employment.

Exceptions

WARN notices may not be required every time the above conditions exist. The exceptions, however, are narrowly applied. Any company seeking to rely on one should discuss the matter with an attorney experienced in working with the WARN Acts.

For example, the WARN Acts recognize a “faltering company” exception. But the mere fact that the company must reduce its workforce isn’t enough to qualify for the exception. (Or else there would be no point to the laws in the first place!). This exception only applies to plant closings and is limited to situations where a company has sought new capital or business in the attempt to stay open and giving notice would ruin the opportunity to get the new capital or business.

Similarly, an “unforeseeable business circumstances” exception applies to closings and layoffs caused by business circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable when notice would otherwise have been required. But, the employer still must give as much notice as possible.

Here are some other scenarios where WARN notices may not be required:

  • The company offers to transfer employees to a different work location within a reasonable commuting distance.
  • The reduction of force results from the completion of a project for which the employees were hired with the understanding that their employment was only for the limited duration of the project (e.g., seasonal employment).
  • A new company will continue employment in connection with the sale of a business.
  • A closing or layoff is the direct result of a natural disaster, such as a flood, earthquake, drought, or storm.
  • The company permanently replaces economic strikers in accordance with the National Labor Relations Act.

WARN Notice Recipients

When notices are required, they must be sent to:

  • affected employees,
  • their unions (if applicable), and
  • certain local, state, and federal government officials.

When the New York State Department of Labor receives a WARN notice, it publishes the information on its website.

Penalties

If a company should have given notice under the New York WARN Act and does not, then it may be held liable for damages to each employee who should have received notice. The employer may have to pay up to 60 days’ pay and benefits, plus civil penalties and attorneys’ fees.

Plan Ahead to Comply with the New York WARN Act

This law forces employers to plan months ahead before reducing their workforces by large numbers. The exceptions generally do not protect employers just because they didn’t know about or want to comply with the notice requirements. As soon as a reduction in force becomes foreseeable, companies must contemplate WARN Act compliance. Sometimes, these requirements will end up forcing employers to delay their desired employment actions. Advance planning and consultation with an experienced labor attorney are usually the best means of avoiding or alleviating that outcome.

 

You may also be interested in my free webinar: Conducting Your Next Reduction in Force.

Don't Fire Me on Friday Webinar

Don’t Fire Me on Friday! (Webinar Recap)

On April 25, 2018, I presented a complimentary webinar called “Don’t Fire Me on Friday!” For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, I’m happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, I go over some practical tips on how to let employees go without aggravating the situation.

Here are some of the DOs that I discuss:

  • Have a Good Reason
  • Notify Them in Person
  • Preserve Their Computer
  • Consider Getting a Release

I also talk about some DON’Ts:

  • Do It on Friday
  • Leave Room for Debate
  • Ignore Reasonable Requests
  • Repeat the Same Mistakes

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch This Webinar

Firing people isn’t the easiest thing to do. Yet, most employers will have to let an employee go at some point.

Many employees will go away quietly, never to be heard from again. A few, however, may remain a thorn in their former employer’s side. This webinar seeks to help you avoid the latter scenario. You can’t change the person you’re firing, but you can control how you do it. There’s no guaranteed formula, but there are some best practices and approaches to avoid.

Learn why I say “Don’t Fire Me on Friday” and more here.

Don’t Miss My Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for my email newsletter to be among the first to know when registration is open for upcoming programs!

Firing Employees Medical Leave

Firing Employees on Medical Leave

Can you legally do this? Yes . . . maybe. Firing an employee on medical leave is a tricky proposition. But sometimes it is appropriate. Even then, it might not go over well.

Let’s review some of the legal issues and practical considerations that come up in this area.

Legal Protections

The full range of legal protections for employees on medical leave depends on where the employee works. But the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) apply throughout the United States. We’ll focus on those laws here, but you should also consider any similar state or local laws that may apply.

ADA

The ADA covers all employers with at least 15 employees. It prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with a disability. It also requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities. Reasonable accommodations may include unpaid medical leave. (Read more: Is Time Off a Reasonable Accommodation?)

Just as refusing time off to an employee with a disability might violate the ADA, so might ending their employment while they’re out of work.

FMLA

Employers with 50 or more employees must allow eligible employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year for specific reasons. These reasons include the employee’s own serious health condition.

Most employees on FMLA leave have the right to return to work at the end of their leave. It is also unlawful to retaliate against an employee for taking FMLA leave. These protections may come into play if an employer seeks to end the employment of someone on FMLA leave.

What You Can’t Do

Employers can’t fire a qualified employee because of their disability . . . . Unless the disability prevents them from performing the essential functions of their job despite any reasonable accommodations.

There are many reasons why managers may get frustrated with employees who seem to never be at work. But there has to be more than just not wanting to deal with someone with a medical condition.

Employers covered by the FMLA also shouldn’t automatically fire an employee who doesn’t return at the end of 12 weeks of FMLA leave. An employee with a medical condition might still be eligible for additional time off as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.

When Could You Fire an Employee on Medical Leave?

There aren’t many absolutes here. Each situation is different and may raise unique concerns, but here are some times when an employer might be able to separate the employment of someone on medical leave:

  • The business is closing, so everyone is losing their job.
  • You are eliminating the person’s position–especially if others not on leave will also lose their jobs without being replaced.
  • The employee has falsified the medical basis for leave.
  • You’ve discovered misconduct that warrants termination regardless of leave status.
  • The employee won’t be able to return for an extended period of time, such that continuing employment is not a reasonable accommodation or would impose an undue hardship.

The above list roughly moves from straightforward to more complicated analyses regarding employees on medical leave. In particular, the last situation involves the complex evaluation of when an accommodation is no longer reasonable–which seldom has an easy answer.

Putting It All Together

Employers should understand that employees are not automatically untouchable just because they’re on medical leave. But, it adds a factor to consider before making the termination decision. The situations posed above are only some of the more common that could occur. As each case raises its own nuances, employers should consult with experienced employment counsel when faced with these decisions.