Category: Employment Law

2025 New York Minimum Wage

2025 New York Minimum Wage

Do you know the 2025 New York minimum wage? Actually, there are different minimum wages for different parts of the state and different industries. Employers must be ready by the end of the year to meet the new requirements that apply to their employees.

The 2025 New York minimum wage rates are shaded in blue in the tables below. The changes take effect on January 1st.

[Follow us on LinkedIn for frequent updates for New York employers.]

Standard New York Minimum Wage

The 2025 New York minimum wage varies by geographic location and sometimes by industry.

For most private employers, the 2025 New York minimum wage in the following chart applies. This chart also applies for non-teaching employees of public school districts or a BOCES. However, there is no New York minimum wage for other employees of public (governmental) employers (but the federal minimum wage of $7.25 does apply).

The chart also shows scheduled minimum wage increases for 2026.

General Minimum Wage Rate Schedule
Location202420252026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester$16.00$16.50$17.00
Remainder of New York State$15.00$15.50$16.00

* After 2026, future New York minimum wage increases will occur based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the Northeast Region. In other words, the minimum wage will be indexed to inflation.

Minimum Wage for Tipped Employees in the Hospitality Industry

New York State has separate minimum wage rules for employees in the hospitality industry. These rules apply to businesses running a restaurant or hotel.

The minimum wage rates for most non-tipped employees in the hospitality industry are set as per the schedule above. However, employers may count a portion of certain tipped employees’ gratuities toward the minimum wage requirements. This is known as a “tip credit.”

New York State has two separate cash wage and tip credit schedules for tipped hospitality employees who qualify as “food service workers” and “service employees.”

Food Service Workers

A food service worker is any employee who is primarily engaged in serving food or beverages to guests, patrons, or customers in the hospitality industry who regularly receive tips. This includes wait staff, bartenders, captains, and busing personnel. It does not include delivery workers.

Hospitality Industry Tipped Minimum Wage Rate Schedule (Food Service Workers)
Location202420252026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester$10.65 Cash
$5.35 Tip		$11.00 Cash
$5.50 Tip		$11.35 Cash
$5.65 Tip
Remainder of New York State$10.00 Cash
$5.00 Tip		$10.35 Cash
$5.15 Tip		$10.70 Cash
$5.30 Tip

Service Employees

The next schedule applies to other service employees. A service employee is one who is not a food service worker or fast food employee who customarily receives tips above an applicable tip threshold (which also follows schedules, not shown here).

Hospitality Industry Tipped Minimum Wage Rate Schedule (Service Employees)
Location202420252026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester$13.35 Cash
$2.65 Tip		$13.75 Cash
$2.75 Tip		$14.15 Cash
$2.85 Tip
Remainder of New York State$12.50 Cash
$2.50 Tip		$12.90 Cash
$2.60 Tip		$13.30 Cash
$2.70 Tip

Overtime Threshold

Along with increases to the 2024 New York minimum wage, the salary requirement to maintain some overtime exemptions will also increase.

The salary threshold for New York’s executive and administrative exemptions go up on January 1st. These amounts are all higher than the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) threshold, which is back down to $684/week after a federal judge enjoined the U.S. DOL’s rule that had initially increased it in July 2024. Most New York employers (other than governmental entities) must satisfy the higher New York threshold to ensure full overtime exemption.

There is no salary requirement for New York’s professional exemption. However, employers must also satisfy the FLSA threshold for most professional employees. Doctors, lawyers, and teachers do not have a salary requirement for exemption.

 

Executive & Administrative Exemption Weekly Salary Threshold Schedule
Location202420252026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester$1,200.00$1,237.50$1,275.00
Remainder of New York State$1,124.20$1,161.65$1,199.10

Prepare Now for the 2025 New York Minimum Wage

New York employers should review their compensation levels and make necessary changes by January 1, 2025. Updates might result in increasing an employee’s hourly wage or salary or reclassifying exempt employees to non-exempt if they will no longer meet the exemption salary requirement.

And, remember, the 2025 New York minimum wage rates only last one year in some cases. Companies will have to review this again next year (or sooner).

To keep up on New York and federal wage and hour requirements and other employment law topics, you can sign up for our email newsletter here or follow us on LinkedIn!

Secretary of Labor Nominee

Trump Surprises with Proposed Secretary of Labor Nominee

In a move few saw coming, President-elect Donald Trump announced Friday that his Secretary of Labor nominee is Republican Representative Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon. Chavez-DeRemer is a politician with a track record of siding with both labor and business interests.

Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination has sparked significant attention due to her co-sponsorship of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act—a bill that would dramatically expand labor rights and weaken right-to-work laws in nearly 30 states. Her cross-aisle appeal, exemplified by support from Teamsters President Sean O’Brien and prominent Democrats like Senator Patty Murray, stands in stark contrast to Trump’s historically pro-business labor agenda.

A Bipartisan (?) Pick with Union Support

Teamsters leader Sean O’Brien lauded the choice for Secretary of Labor nominee. He noted Trump’s outreach to his union last year and framed Chavez-DeRemer as a unifying figure for workers and businesses. “Now let’s grow wages and improve working conditions nationwide,” O’Brien said, signaling optimism about the nominee’s potential impact.

Chavez-DeRemer, a former mayor of Happy Valley, Oregon, and entrepreneur in the healthcare field, lost her reelection bid earlier this month but left Congress with a distinct reputation. As one of the few GOP members to align with progressive labor goals, her nomination has already garnered praise from unions, including the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers.

Reaction from Conservatives

The announcement has provoked backlash from influential conservative groups. Americans for Prosperity, a staunchly pro-business organization, criticized the nomination, arguing it betrays Trump’s previous labor policies and risks alienating his base.

“Trump’s record on labor policy was so strong, and he didn’t flip on a single labor issue yet still improved with union voters,” said AFP’s Akash Chougule. “He completely undid that and undermined his own agenda and movement by picking a teachers union hack for Labor. Senate GOP should reject this nomination.”

Chavez-DeRemer’s pro-labor stance—embodied in her support for legislation like the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act—has drawn ire from right-to-work advocates who view her as out of step with Republican orthodoxy.

Immediate Challenges for the Department of Labor

If confirmed, Chavez-DeRemer will face several pressing issues at the Department of Labor. Among the most urgent is the long-awaited update to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) salary exemption test. The Biden administration proposed increasing the salary threshold for exempt employees—potentially expanding overtime eligibility for millions of workers. A federal court recently struck down the rule, and the new administration will have to decide whether to appeal or walk away from the rule. Business groups have expressed concern over the financial burden of such changes, while labor advocates argue that the update is long overdue to ensure fair pay for workers.

Chavez-DeRemer will also have to address broader labor market challenges, including:

  • Modernizing worker classifications to reflect the evolving gig economy, a contentious issue that pits tech companies against labor advocates.
  • Reevaluating federal regulations on independent contractors and joint employers, key concerns for both unions and businesses.
  • Enforcing compliance with labor standards while balancing business concerns about regulatory overreach.

Her ability to navigate these challenges will define the department’s trajectory under the new administration and could influence how workers and businesses view Trump’s labor policies moving forward.

What This Means for Trump’s Labor Agenda

This nomination signals a potential shift in Trump’s labor policy approach. While his first term focused on deregulation and business-friendly initiatives under Labor Secretaries Alexander Acosta and Eugene Scalia, Chavez-DeRemer’s selection could open the door to more balanced policies aimed at addressing worker concerns.

Her ability to navigate confirmation in a polarized Senate remains uncertain. However, her potential bipartisan appeal, bolstered by endorsements from unions and some Democrats, positions her as a viable, albeit controversial, choice to lead the Department of Labor.

A Nominee with a Unique Profile

Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination follows a line of Trump labor secretaries with diverse backgrounds, but her record stands apart. A Latina entrepreneur and former mayor, she combines business experience with a legislative focus on worker rights—a combination that may redefine the Labor Department’s priorities under Trump’s second administration.

Whether this move represents a new chapter in Trump’s labor policy or a temporary departure from his traditional approach, one thing is certain: Lori Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination has set the stage for a heated confirmation battle and a possible recalibration of how the federal government balances labor and business interests.

Just One Part of the Equation

Even if Chavez-DeRemer is confirmed to head the U.S. DOL, the administration will be more business-friendly. Her views are not shared with other Republicans in Congress, making pro-union or worker amendments to federal law unlikely. Plus, the National Labor Relations Board has more direct control over much of the field of employer-union relations. Through other appointments, President Trump is still likely to effect significant rollbacks from pro-labor interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act that have stifled employers during the Biden administration.

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

FTC Non-Compete Ban Blocked

FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Blocked Nationwide

On August 20, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas enjoined the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) proposed non-compete ban. The decision, issued by U.S. District Court Judge Ada E. Brown, sets aside the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule.  So, the FTC cannot attempt to enforce the rule when it is scheduled to take effect on September 4, 2024.

The case is captioned as Ryan LLC (Plaintiff) and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce (Plaintiff-Intervenors) v. Federal Trade Commission, Civil Action No. 3:24-CV-00986-E.

Basis for Injunction

Judge Brown found two legal deficiencies in the promulgation of the FTC’s non-compete rule.

Exceeding Statutory Authority

The court found that the FTC exceeded its statutory authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). The ruling emphasized that the FTC does not have the power to issue substantive rules that broadly prohibit non-compete agreements across all industries and employment levels. The FTC’s authority to prevent unfair methods of competition does not extend to the creation of sweeping, substantive regulations such as this Non-Compete Rule.

Arbitrary and Capricious Action

The court also determined that the FTC’s rule was arbitrary and capricious. The ruling criticized the FTC for imposing a one-size-fits-all ban on non-compete agreements without adequately considering less restrictive alternatives or providing a rational basis for the rule. Plus, the FTC’s reliance on certain studies was insufficient to justify such a broad prohibition. The judge noted that no state had enacted a rule as far-reaching as the FTC’s proposed regulation.

According to Judge Brown, “In sum, the Rule is based on inconsistent and flawed empirical evidence, fails to consider the positive benefits of non-compete agreements, and disregards the substantial body of evidence supporting these agreements.”

Status Quo Preserved

With the proposed non-compete ban blocked, employers may continue using non-competes to the extent allowed under applicable state law. Note that some states, such as California, already largely prohibit the enforcement of non-compete clauses.

While this ruling halts the FTC’s current efforts, it does not entirely close the door on federal regulation of non-competes. The FTC may attempt to appeal the decision (though the relevant appellate courts are not expected to reach a different conclusion). Alternatively, the FTC may revise its approach with a more limited non-compete ban. Some individual state legislatures will probably revisit potential non-compete bans as well.

 

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.