Author: Scott Horton

Scott has been practicing Labor & Employment law in New York for almost 20 years. He has represented over 400 employers and authored 100s of articles and presentations and wrote the book New York Management Law: The Practical Guide to Employment Law for Business Owners and Managers. Nothing on this blog can be considered legal advice. If you want legal advice, you need to retain an attorney.

Workplace Bullying

Workplace Bullying

Most agree that all bullying is inappropriate, but is workplace bullying unlawful? Technically, it usually isn’t. While physical attacks are illegal, mere insults, shouting, generating rumors, or giving “the cold shoulder” typically are not enough to produce a valid legal claim. However, there are some notable exceptions. Under certain laws, bullying may be a basis for a lawsuit if it is directed towards legally protected characteristics.

Generally, bullying is defined as intentional harmful conduct towards others. This can include verbal harassment, threats, insults, or physical violence. Bullying can also occur in the form of coercion, such as manipulation, generating rumors, or blackmail. This conduct can also extend to outside the workplace, such as stalking. Although there can be one singular occurrence, workplace bullying tends to occur in patterns. There is often an imbalance of power between the harasser and victim, such as a supervisor harassing employees.

Effects of Workplace Bullying

Clearly, bullying can cause physical and psychological distress for the victim. Moreover, bullying can also have harmful effects on an organization as a whole. If offensive conduct continues, it can lead to an organizational culture that accepts this type of behavior. This leads to lower employee morale and higher turnover. It can also lessen overall productivity.

Workplace Harassment

Harassment based on protected characteristics is a type of discrimination. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from harassment based on sex, color, national origin, race, and religion. This includes protection from sexual harassment. Other federal laws, such as the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act also prohibit harassment. State laws also prohibit discrimination on these and other characteristics.

Harassment involves conduct that results in changing the terms or conditions of the victim’s employment. If offensive comments are directed at an employee’s protected characteristic or only to employees of a specific characteristic, there may be a basis for legal action. The standard for determining harassment is how a reasonable employee perceived the comment or statement. The speaker’s intent is not a relevant factor.

If an alleged victim can prove that unlawful harassment occurred, the employer can be held liable for the conduct. This could be the case even if the employer was unaware of the behavior, if the court finds that they should have known.

For more, read “What Makes Workplace Harassment Unlawful?”

Equal Opportunity Harasser Defense

Employers occasionally assert an “equal opportunity harasser” defense to refute the assertion that the offensive conduct was directed at a protected characteristic. For instance, a supervisor shouts at all employees regularly. When an employee attempts to bring a lawsuit where one of the allegations is harassment due to his race, etc., the employer will respond the conduct was not directed towards any protected characteristic because that supervisor shouts at all employees regardless of race. This can be a legally valid and effective defense to a claim of harassment. However, allowing this management style is not necessarily good for employee morale or deterring harassment complaints in the first place.

Common Law Tort Claims

Even if the conduct does not relate to a protected category, there is still a risk of litigation. If the offensive conduct becomes sufficiently outrageous, employees might have grounds for a tort claim. The legal standard for these claims is usually higher for plaintiffs than under the employment discrimination statutes. Where successful, damage calculations in these cases relate to the alleged mental suffering by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s conduct.

Protected Concerted Activity

The National Labor Relations Act protects employee activity in furtherance of collective goals. This means harassment, intimidation, or bullying of other employees on behalf of union objectives is protected under this federal law that applies to many private employers even if their employees are not unionized. For example, employees who repeatedly pressure other employees to call in sick on a particular day to stage a “sick-out” protest of company policy may have protection from discipline. This protection even extends to workplaces without unions, so long as the activity at issue aims at benefitting employees collectively in their employment.

Workplace Civility Policies

Although workplace bullying is not illegal, employers often have workplace civility policies. These prescribe discipline or termination of employees who bully other employees. These policies are most effective when there are clear definitions of terms like “bullying” and “harassment.”

Potential Workplace Bullying Laws

So far, at least 29 states have introduced bills aimed at making workplace bullying illegal. However, none of these bills have passed, so bullying in the workplace is currently not expressly illegal in any state. Remember, however, that many states have harassment laws similar to or more extensive than federal laws.

New York is one state where the Legislature might finally pass anti-bullying legislation before too much longer. There, the “Healthy Workplace Bill” has been reintroduced several times, but has not yet passed. If the bill ever succeeds, it will create a legal claim against employers who allowed bullying to occur.

The Healthy Workplace Bill, as previously proposed, would make it unlawful for employers to subject employees to an “abusive work environment.” This is defined as “a workplace in which an employee is subjected to abusive conduct that is so severe that it causes physical or psychological harm to such employee, and where such employee provides notice to the employer that such employee has been subjected to abusive conduct and such employer after receiving notice thereof, fails to eliminate the abusive conduct”. Potential remedies under this bill include reinstatement, removal of the harasser from the plaintiff’s work environment, back pay, medical expenses, punitive damages, and attorney fees.

Employer Precautions

Although workplace bullying itself isn’t (yet) per se illegal, it’s not something employers should tolerate. If nothing else, with so many protected categories under state and federal employment discrimination statutes, any bullying could prompt a harassment complaint. Of course, beyond the risk of litigation, bullying hurts employee morale and hence productivity.

Still, anti-bullying laws would be very burdensome for employers. They would go far beyond traditional legal risks. Employers would need to become even more proactive in ensuring employees are nice to each other. That will be a tall task for many companies on short notice. That’s another good reason to start now in trying to improve interpersonal relationships between co-workers and with their supervisors. And, hopefully, there would be many positive impacts on the business beyond avoiding lawsuits.

 

Special thanks to University at Buffalo Law School student Erin Killian for her work on the preparation of this article.

Spring 2019 Employment Law Update

Spring 2019 Employment Law Update (Webinar Recap)

On April 18, 2019, I presented a complimentary webinar called “Spring 2019 Employment Law Update.” For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, I’m happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, I discuss:

  • EEO-1 Filing Status
  • Proposed FLSA Regulations
  • NY GENDA & Voting Leave
  • Other New York State & Local Laws

This is a broad update for all employers with employees in New York State. It addresses some things that have already changed, some pending regulatory proposals, and other possible future legal developments. One or more of the issues discussed would likely affect every employer in New York State. Some organizations may have to deal with every issue I covered in this webinar.

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch “Spring 2019 Employment Law Update”

There is something for every New York organization in this webinar. Whether you are a small business, large corporation, non-profit organization, or governmental entity, one or more of these developments will affect your employees. Be prepared for upcoming changes and review new laws that are already in place.

Here are just a few of the takeaways from this legal update webinar:

  • Employers with 100+ employees will probably have to report pay data on this year’s EEO-1 reports.
  • FLSA salary level for exemptions will likely go up later this year.
  • Many more New York employees are now eligible for paid leave from work to vote in public elections.
  • Paid sick leave and bans on inquiring about applicant salary history could be coming to your workplace.

These are just a few of the details we addressed in much more detail in this one-hour webinar. Watching the recording at your earliest convenience should pay dividends to your organization.

Don’t Miss Our Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for our free email newsletter for periodic updates and invitations to our next webinar!

New York Paid Voting Leave

New York Extends Paid Voting Leave

In its 2019-2020 budget, New York made several changes to the state’s election laws. This includes a major expansion of the law regarding time off from work to vote. Employers must now allow up to 3 hours of paid voting leave for registered voters for every election.

Old Voting Leave Law

In the past, New York employers had to give some registered voters 2 hours of paid time off. Employees could only insist on paid voting leave if they did not have 4 consecutive hours between either the opening of the polls and the beginning of their working shift or the end of their working shift and the closing of the polls.

Employees who had less than 4 consecutive hours before or after their shifts to vote could take off so much
working time as would when added to their voting time outside their working hours enable them to vote. But employers would never have to pay an employee for more than two hours of the time off to vote.

New Paid Voting Leave Obligations

Now employers have to give more paid voting leave to more employees.

The “4 consecutive hours” criteria are gone. All employees now apparently have a legal right to paid voting leave.

And the 2-hour maximum has increased to 3 hours.

The law still retains language suggesting employees may only take so much time as necessary to enable them to vote. And they only have the right to take time either at the beginning or end of the shift, unless they agree otherwise with the employer.

Employees must notify their employers at least two days in advance that they “require” time off to vote to invoke the law’s protections.

Notice of Employee Rights

As before, employers must post a notice containing the paid voting leave law’s provisions at least 10 days before every election. Some employers choose to keep the notice posted at all times to ensure compliance. That is an acceptable practice. The notice must at least remain up until the polls close on election day.

Click here for a copy of the law for posting.

Covered Elections

The paid voting leave law applies to all elections in New York where voters nominate or elect people to any federal, state, county, city, town, or village office.

Penalty for Violation

Any person or corporation who does not allow an eligible employee to take time off or who reduces an employee’s pay for taking time off to vote as required can be found guilty of a criminal misdemeanor.

An employee who loses pay required under the law may be able to recover it through the Department of Labor or a lawsuit. Additional penalties might apply.

What Employers Must Do

Many employers will have to give employees time off to vote where they didn’t before. The law is now vague enough that virtually any employee could request paid time off to vote. Employers will have to get more information from some employees to determine their obligations under the law.

In the meantime, employers should obtain copies of the new law (available here) to post in advance of elections. You should also review your employee handbook or other policies and revise them as necessary.

 

Need a reliable source for New York employment law updates? Sign up for our free monthly email newsletter.