Tag: sexual harassment

Anti-Harassment Training

5 Best Reasons for Anti-Harassment Training

The media is full of devastating reports of sexual harassment these days. This is the time for us all to figure out how to put an end to it, along with all other forms of harassment. This is especially critical to employers. Not just because harassment is wrong and bad for business. But also because of their legal obligations under employment discrimination laws. Anti-harassment training is a key component of avoiding liability in this area.

Yes, training employees involves costs. You not only have to pay someone to conduct the training, but you also must invest the time of your employees to participate. But, even though most employers are not strictly required to provide anti-harassment training, it’s really too costly not to.

Still not convinced? Here are the 5 Best Reasons for providing Anti-Harassment Training in your workplace:

1. The Law Requires It (Where Applicable)

A few states require employers to provide sexual harassment training.

In California and Connecticut, employers with 50+ employees must provide 2 hours of sexual harassment prevention training to all supervisors in the state.  Covered employers must provide the training within 6 months of hire or promotion. California also requires retraining of these employees at least every 2 years.

Maine requires employers with 15+ employees to conduct an sexual harassment education and training program for all new employees in their first year of employment. More in-depth training is required for management and supervisory employees.

Several other states require training for certain employees, most typically those employed by the state itself. Most states, however, do not affirmatively require employers to conduct anti-harassment training.

The few laws that require training are limited to sexual harassment. However, I think it is very important not to limit anti-harassment training to harassment based on sex. This approach disproportionately victimizes women. A discussion of various protected characteristics brings everyone into the mix as a potential victim and harasser–obviously with the goal of having everyone be neither!

2. It Creates a Defense to Employee Claims

Even employers who are not in states that require them to provide anti-harassment training have good law-based reasons for doing so. Under most state and federal employment discrimination laws, the courts recognize a possible defense for employers who have taken reasonable efforts to prevent harassment. This is commonly known as the Faragher/Ellerth defense, based on the names of two U.S. Supreme Court cases.

This defense doesn’t help where the alleged harassment resulted in a “tangible employment action,” which could include reduction in pay, denial of promotion, or termination, for example.

In other cases, the employer the Faragher/Ellerth defense may apply if the employer can show that:

(a) The employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any harassing behavior; and

(b) The employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities by the employer or otherwise unreasonably failed to avoid harm.

As a practical matter, establishing this defense requires the employer to at least have an anti-harassment policy and an effective complaint procedure. Okay, so where does the training come in?

If nothing else, anti-harassment training goes a long way in helping an employer establish that employees knew about the anti-harassment policy and how to file a complaint! Ideally, the training will also encourage employees to report relatively minor incidents earlier so they don’t escalate into more serious situations. The employer’s prompt response in such cases can further prove the effectiveness its policy and procedures.

Click for more on Responding to Employment Discrimination Complaints.

3. Good Employees Will Behave Better

No one is arguing that if every employer provided anti-harassment training it would stop workplace harassment entirely. There’s not even good data that it will meaningfully deter the people most likely to engage in unlawful harassment. But let’s look at what it does do.

Think about your model employee, at least from a behavior standpoint. This may be the person most likely to change behavior following anti-harassment training. He or she hardly ever makes inappropriate comments to co-workers in the first place. But that doesn’t mean they are perfect and always avoid making others uncomfortable. Good training will demonstrate subtle ways they may occasionally offend others. Well-behaved employees will readily pick up on these examples and conform their behavior. They’ll become even more pleasant to work with and less likely to offend other employees.

Perhaps even more important, training can empower these good employees to recognize when others cross the line. Ideally, it will give them the knowledge and encouragement to speak up, either directly to the harasser or to human resources, etc. Or at least it will show them the value of speaking to those who suffer harassment from others to offer support.

4. Bad Employees Will Be Stopped

It would be nice to think that good training will deter employees from engaging in harassment. But the employees most likely to offend others may also be those least likely to accept readily that they’re doing anything wrong.

The good news is that because you hopefully have many more “good employees” than “bad” ones, the training can still reduce incidents of harassment. Training can show employees how to stand up for themselves and others. This can help end harassment as soon as it start. Or, if harassment persists, the victims and their co-workers will know how to report it. Then its just up to the organization to investigate appropriately and take the right action to correct the situation.

Related: What does it mean to have a “Zero-Tolerance” Anti-Harassment Policy?

5. It Sends the Right Message

Admittedly, most employees don’t look forward to attending anti-harassment training. But they can’t deny that workplace harassment is a very serious matter. And many, especially those who have felt victimized by harassment, will appreciate their employer’s efforts to address the subject.

Put differently, what does it say if you don’t provide anti-harassment training? At best, it suggests you accept harassment as inevitable and unavoidable. At worse, it appears your organization is indifferent to harassment. Providing the training doesn’t cost enough to justify either message.

You may also be interested in this webinar, where I discuss my Top 7 Tips for Investigating Workplace Harassment Complaints.

What Are Employers Thankful For in 2017

What Are Employers Thankful for in 2017?

In advance of Thanksgiving 2017, I thought I would recap some of the most significant labor and employment law developments so far this year. Let’s take a look at what’s making employers thankful this holiday season!

I recognize that some do not personally agree with all of the policy and legal issues discussed here, but they are generally “positives” for employers with respect to the employment relationship.

No Increase (Yet) to Federal Overtime Threshold

This time last year, employers across the country were preparing for a huge increase in the salary level for many common FLSA overtime exemptions. The Department of Labor’s new rules then scheduled to take effect December 1, 2016, would have more than doubled the salary requirement from $455 weekly to $913 per week. In addition, the rules provided for automatic increases to the threshold every 3 years.

Then, on November 22, 2016, a federal judge in Texas enjoined the rule before it took effect. The Department of Labor preserved its rights to keep fighting, but under President Trump it has shifted its priority toward reconsidering the rules. The injunction is still on appeal, but it is clear the Trump DOL will not try to implement the 2016 rules.

It seems likely that the DOL will instead come up with a new set of rules. They will probably increase the salary requirement to a level below $913 per week. But we are probably at least a year away from any changes taking effect.

Republican Control of the National Labor Relations Board

Attorney Peter B. Robb was sworn in as General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board on November 17, 2017. He replaces Obama-appointee Richard F. Griffin, Jr., who served from November 4, 2013 to October 31, 2017.

Robb has represented employers in labor and employment law for approximately the past 30 years. For more on his background, read this earlier post.

As chief prosecutor for the NLRB, Robb will have significant control over the agency’s agenda during his 4-year term.

Two President Trump nominees had already joined the 5-member Board, giving Republicans a 3-2 majority over the agency’s adjudicatory body. Read more about new Labor Board members Marvin Kaplan and William Emanuel.

Experts anticipate that the Republican majority will reverse many pro-labor decisions from the Obama-era NLRB. Some prime targets for review are decisions related to:

  • Joint employer doctrine
  • Mandatory arbitration/class-action waivers
  • Micro bargaining units
  • Union election procedures
  • Social media policies
  • Graduate student collective bargaining
  • Employee use of employer-provide email accounts
  • Confidentiality of internal investigations

Although employers must continue to abide by the National Labor Relations Act, including respecting employees’ Section 7 rights, they should gradually regain more leeway to run their businesses with the new Board.

Congressional Disinterest in Employment Laws

Sure, healthcare and taxes are major topics of interest for all businesses. And they’re very much on the table. But there has been little meaningful discussion of further regulating the employment relationship at the federal level.

If anything, this Congress may eventually try to loosen burdens on employers. This could include legislation to expedite issues that the NLRB and Department of Labor could more slowly address through adjudication and rulemaking. Efforts are already underway to relax existing joint employer tests, for example.

One issue raised by Trump’s campaign, paid family leave, remains just off the back burner. However, the most viable legislation floated so far seems to involve optional leave programs. It seems clear that the Republican Congress isn’t eager to impose more burdens on employers just because the President threw an idea out there.

What Else Would Make Employers Thankful?

Here are just a few thoughts about some other issues that would make employers thankful going forward. Some would be easier to achieve than others

1. More effective means of preventing workplace harassment.

Sexual harassment has become a hot media topic recently. This is unfortunate in that the harassment, including assault, occurred in the first place. But at least the recent accounts are shining a spotlight and motivating people to do something about it.

This does, however, have a significant potential impact on employers. Various employment discrimination laws prohibit harassment based on many protected characteristics not limited to sexual harassment. It’s reasonable to assume that more employees will come forward to report harassment in light of the recent societal openness on the subject. This will require employers to expend resources on investigations and enhanced training. Plus, some will inevitably be held liable, meaning settlements, legal fees, and damages awards.

For some well-run businesses, this will mean increased costs, both direct and to productivity. They should recognize the inevitable and try to come up with innovative ways to prevent harassment. Areas of consideration include hiring, performance reviews, management accountability, and even exit interviews. This may well not be an area where the law will help employers. But, if necessary, the existing laws can help provide the motivation to act.

2. Resolution of the Affordable Care Act debate.

Congress remains within a couple Senate votes from repealing the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”). Like it or hate it, employers need to know what’s going to happen with this law that still hasn’t fully taken effect. The only thing that seems clear is that many of the existing (in writing) requirements upon employers will never actually materialize. But it’s still something of a guessing game to determine what will apply and when.

Most likely, we’ll have a new set of rules in this area within a couple of years. But who knows what they’ll look like! With the ever increasing cost of health insurance, uncertainty surrounding employers’ responsibilities is a major headache, at best.

3. Clarity in dealing with employee disabilities.

There are so many laws that apply when addressing an employee medical situation. These include the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), worker’s compensation laws, state disability discrimination laws, and more.

It’s hard enough to comply with any one of these sets of rules, let alone all of them together. They leave many traps for the unwary and the well-intentioned employer alike. Even though employers usually want to be fair to employees with medical conditions, they must consider other employees and effective operation of the business as well.

For now, employers just have to accept that managing these situations is complicated. Perhaps one day some wise lawmakers can come up with a good a solution that make many employers thankful.

You may also be interested in reading 5 Big Legal Questions for New York Employers.

Investigating Workplace Harassment Complaints Webinar

Top 7 Tips for Investigating Workplace Harassment Complaints (Webinar)

On November 16, 2017, I presented a complimentary webinar on Investigating Workplace Harassment Complaints. For those who weren’t able to attend the live webinar, I’m happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, I discuss my Top 7 Tips for Investigating Workplace Harassment Complaints:

  1. Be Prompt and Thorough
  2. Maintain Appropriate Confidentiality
  3. Get Buy-in from the Complainant
  4. Put It in Writing
  5. Involve Your Attorney
  6. Reach Conclusions, but Not Too Early
  7. Avoid Retaliation

Click below to access the supplemental materials for this webinar:

  1. Webinar Slides
  2. Guide to Investigating Workplace Harassment Investigations

Why You Should Watch This Webinar

Reports of sexual harassment have flooded all media channels recently. This accounts highlight the need for business organizations to be proactive in avoiding workplace harassment in the first place. But that isn’t always possible. When harassment allegations do come to light, employers must respond appropriately to prevent escalation, which can have devastating negative consequences.

Organizations must investigate every allegation of harassment, even when the victim prefers to keep the matter confidential. Harassment is wrong and detrimental to productivity in the first place. But, once management knows of inappropriate conduct, failure to promptly investigate and take appropriate corrective action can also result in significant legal liability.

This webinar gives some important tips on how to investigate harassment  complaints without making things worse. It includes practical advice and potential pitfalls for human resources professionals and management.