Tag: resignation

New York Unemployment Benefits Severance Pay

Severance Pay Affects New York Unemployment Benefits

Since a 2014 reform to New York State’s Unemployment Insurance System, employees are generally not eligible to receive both severance pay and unemployment insurance at the same time. However, there are exceptions and nuances to this rule. As a result, employers sometimes have options that can affect their former employees’ receipt of New York unemployment benefits.

[You might also want to review this article on “Contesting New York Unemployment Claims”.]

New York Unemployment Benefits

In New York, employees must be completely unemployed and actively seeking work to be eligible for unemployment benefits. Most unemployed individuals with sufficient work history will be eligible for benefits. Employees who resigned or engaged in misconduct might not receive benefits.

Until several years ago, severance pay did not change employees’ New York unemployment benefits. Now, however, it often will.

What is Severance Pay?

New York’s unemployment insurance law defines severance pay as “payments made by an employer to an employee due to separation from employment.” Severance pay generally does not include payments regarding retirement, health insurance, accrued leave, or unemployment benefits.

The law recognizes that severance pay can be paid in several payments or one lump sum. And now the timing of the payment(s) matters for unemployment purposes.

Why Timing Matters

Whether severance pay affects unemployment benefits can depend on when the employer makes the payments.

If an employee receives severance pay within 30 days of his or her last day of employment, the severance may offset the unemployment benefits. In that scenario, the employee will not receive unemployment if the weekly severance payments (or pro rata portion of a lump-sum payment) are higher than the maximum weekly unemployment benefit rate. Once the severance payments have ended, the employee may be eligible to receive unemployment benefits (assuming they meet standard eligibility requirements).

On the other hand, if the employee does not begin receiving severance pay until more than 30 days have passed since their last day of employment, they can immediately collect unemployment. In this situation, the severance pay will not affect New York unemployment benefits at all.

(The “last day of employment” is the last day an employee was actually working or was on paid leave.)

Keep This in Mind

Eligibility to receive New York unemployment benefits is often an important issue for departing employees. Employers should carefully consider unemployment issues in developing severance packages.

When employers have options in structuring the severance payout, they should factor in the impact on unemployment benefits. The decisions involved can have meaningful financial implications for both the employer’s business and the former employee. The “right” choice will likely vary in different situations.

Contesting New York Unemployment

Contesting New York Unemployment Claims

Are departing employees eligible for unemployment? As usual, it depends. To claim unemployment insurance benefits in New York, employees usually must be totally unemployed, yet available for and seeking work. After that, the most important factors are whether the employee has worked long enough to qualify and the reason for separation from employment. Here, we’ll focus on that last question, as it’s the one employers most often use in contesting unemployment claims.

Before we go any further, here are related free webinars that might interest you:

Why Isn’t the Employee Working?

Unemployed individuals with sufficient recent work history will receive unemployment insurance benefits unless they became unemployed because of a disqualifying reason.

The primary disqualifying reasons for loss of employment are:

  • Voluntary resignation
  • Misconduct

Neither category is entirely straightforward under New York’s unemployment law.

Voluntary Resignation

Employees who quite a job entirely of their own accord usually will not receive unemployment benefits. However, there are some exceptions.

First, the departure must be truly voluntary. Employees who have no real choice but to “resign” may still receive unemployment. This could occur where the employer gives the employee the option to either resign or be terminated. It also includes situations where the employer was treating the employee unlawfully such that the employee understandably felt compelled to leave.

A second scenario is more surprising to employers. Suppose an employee resigns from Company A to work for Company B. If the employee then loses their job with Company B soon enough and for a non-disqualifying reason, then Company A may be credited with some portion of the employee’s resulting unemployment claim. Company A seldom can do anything to avoid or contest this result.

Misconduct

Many employees lose their jobs due to workplace misconduct. However, many of those employees will still receive unemployment benefits. Even when employers contest unemployment claims, proving disqualifying misconduct is difficult.

To win an unemployment claim based on misconduct, an employer must prove either extremely bad behavior or prior specific warning of the consequences for the behavior. In most cases, poor performance will not rise to the level of misconduct under the New York unemployment law.

Examples of misconduct that may justify a denial of unemployment benefits include theft, physical violence, falsifying documents, and workplace drug use. In addition, any misconduct that constitutes a felony should disqualify an employee.

Many other forms of misconduct that support termination of employment will not necessarily result in denial of benefits. These may include poor attendance, insubordination, carelessness, and violation of employer rules. However, any of these behaviors could constitute disqualifying misconduct under the right circumstances. Usually, this requires prior warning of the specific improper behavior and the future consequence of termination followed by more incidents.

Overall, the analysis of misconduct depends on the facts. But close calls usually get decided in the employee’s favor.

Minimizing Successful Unemployment Claims

Most New York employers of any size must accept some unemployment claims as part of doing business. Obviously, one way to avoid these claims would be never to let anyone go against their will. But that probably isn’t a good business model.

Employers who want to minimize the impact on their claims history can take precautions before discharging employees. This includes having clear discipline policies that spell out what forms of conduct are unacceptable. But that alone probably is not enough. Even if not written into policy, most employers will want to follow the concept of progressive discipline. This allows that extreme misconduct will cost employees their job in the first instance. However, employees will get a second chance for less consequential missteps. Any discipline notices should then include specific language about the consequences of further violations. When warranted, that would be termination of employment. With that prior warning in place, an employer’s chances of contesting the employee’s unemployment claim will increase.

For more about ending the employment relationship, check out these webinars: Don’t Fire Me on Friday and Conducting Your Next Reduction in Force.

Voluntary Separation Programs

Voluntary Separation Programs

Voluntary separation programs can be mutually beneficial devices for making workforce adjustments. Employers can use them on their own or as a precursor to an involuntary program. Each program is different, but some common elements appear regularly.

What Is a Voluntary Separation Program?

Generally, I’m talking about any circumstance where an organization provides a group of employees the opportunity to resign voluntarily and obtain specified benefits that they would not otherwise be entitled to receive.

Reasons for Voluntary Separation Programs

There are many reasons why companies decide to implement voluntary separation programs. These are probably the most common:

Reduce Headcount

Whether due to lower business volume, technological advances, or other factors, sometimes companies no longer need as many workers. The result: a reduction in force. The options? Voluntary or involuntary terminations. It’s usually not enough for a company to announce that it needs 10 fewer employees only to discover that 10 people are ready to leave anyway. Instead, they may try to offer some inducement to entice employees to move on.

Reduce Payroll

Although reducing headcount can sometimes be a cost-saving measure, it doesn’t have to be. Some companies may have reason to downsize without spending less on labor costs. Space constraints, for example might make it economical to pay fewer people to do as much or more work.

But often money is a significant factor. And reducing payroll doesn’t have to mean reducing headcount. The focus could be on parting ways with more highly compensated employees. The company may even plan to replace them very soon, but with someone who demands a lower wage or salary.

Reorganize Functions

Neither money nor numbers have to be primary considerations. An organization may simply have the wrong personnel for their business going forward. Voluntary separation programs may coincide with retraining programs, for example. The idea could be to allow those who don’t want to transition to new roles to leave the company with some form of compensation for helping the business progress.

Facilitate Retirements

Companies can’t force employees out because of their age. But there may be ways they can make it easier for an employee to retire voluntarily. Many workers of traditional retirement age who would like to retire cannot afford to do so these days. In some situations it makes sense for their employers to provide an optional retirement program that would provide monetary or other (e.g., health insurance) benefits to allow employees to wrap up their careers on their own terms.

Structuring Voluntary Separation Programs

The ideal first step is to determine the company’s goals. Is it one of the four categories above? A combination of them? Something else?

With goals in mind, the employer can then consider which employees will be eligible to participate in the program. The program shouldn’t discriminate based on any protected characteristic, but not everyone needs to be offered the chance to participate. If the goals correspond to functional or headcount issues, then the company might only offer the program to specific departments or job functions. If costs are a factor, then the offer may extend only to relatively high earners.

The next step is to determine what to offer the employees. Usually, this would include some amount of cash severance pay. Health insurance or other benefit continuation may also be appropriate. Sometimes employers also offer out-placement services, like career counseling or skills training, to individuals who will remain in the workforce rather than retire altogether.

Normally, if the employer will be giving out something of value to employees who choose to leave, they should require the employee to sign a release of claims. Otherwise, despite the “voluntary” nature of the program, employees may turn around and sue the company. They may claim wrongful termination, or the allegations may relate to other aspects of their prior employment. Most employees who choose to participate in a separation program won’t object to signing a release. Those who do were probably going to cause trouble anyway. Then at least their reluctance or refusal to sign sends a valuable signal to the employer.

(Click here more on employee releases.)

Pitfalls to Avoid

Voluntary separation programs often work out well. However, as with everything, there are traps for the unwary. Here are some.

First, some employers use these programs to get younger. This raises potential age discrimination concerns. Merely offering a voluntary program that gives more senior employees the opportunity to resign/retire usually shouldn’t be unlawful. But companies must be careful about their approach. An employer who has been outspoken about getting younger to cut costs, bring on new skill sets, etc., can expect rumblings about age discrimination (if not litigation) if it later terminates the employment of older workers, even if justifiable on factors other than age.

Second, employers should obtain releases only after employment has ended. Sometimes employees accept a voluntary severance package, sign a release, and then continue to work until a later separation date. Then if something transpires between signing the release and the formal separation from employment, the release will not stop the employee from asserting a claim.

Third, organizations must plan for multiple possible outcomes. Sometimes the voluntary program produces the desired workforce changes on its own. Other times, too many, too few, or the wrong employees elect to participate. It may be possible to structure the program to avoid some of these bad outcomes (e.g., by limiting participation to a particular number of employees). But, whatever the approach, the voluntary nature leaves the results largely in the employees’ hands. Thus, employers should plan ahead for the next steps based on different contingencies.

Fourth, business needs can change quickly. And it takes time to design and implement a voluntary separation program. It is often best to keep a tight timeline for the program, so it wraps up before business conditions change significantly.

Final Thoughts

Implementing a voluntary separation program requires considerable planning. For most companies this planning should involve a team who can both provide the necessary background information/skills and keep the program confidential until launch. Team members ideally should include upper management, supervisors, human resources, and legal counsel experienced with group termination programs.