Tag: employment agreement

Employment Agreement Webinar

What’s in an Employment Agreement? (Webinar Recap)

On February 27, 2020, Julie Bastian and I presented a complimentary webinar called “What’s in an Employment Agreement?”. For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, we’re happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, we discuss:

  • Position and Duties
  • Compensation and Benefits
  • Term/Termination
  • Confidentiality and Non-competes
  • Intellectual Property Rights

There is no magic prescription for the perfect employment agreement. Each organization has different structures and operational needs. Your company might not use need employment agreements, or at least not for every employee.

This webinar discusses various common components of employment agreements to help you decide how to use them, if at all, in your business.

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch “What’s in an Employment Agreement?”

It’s seldom an optimal strategy to take an employment contract off the shelf somewhere and use it across your organization. Each provision has potential practical and legal impacts. So you have to carefully think through what your business needs and adjust your agreements accordingly.

There are some basics found in most employment agreements. But even before you get there, you have to decide whether every employee should sign a written contract. In some industries, they’re very common. In others, not so much.

Employment agreements can range from one page to dozens. This webinar will help you match your needs and objectives to what you put on paper and ask employees to sign.

Do you even know what your employees are agreeing to right now? Use this webinar as a checklist to better understand what you can or can’t and should or shouldn’t expect employees to agree to in your situation.

Don’t Miss Our Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter to be among the first to know when registration is open for upcoming programs!

And follow us on LinkedIn for even more frequent updates on important employment law issues.

At-Will Employment Myth

Is At-Will Employment a Myth?

Forty-nine of 50 U.S. states (all but Montana) still formally recognize the at-will employment doctrine. This principle means that either the employer or employee may end an employment relationship at any time, with or without notice, for any reason or no reason at all.  However, there are now many separate limitations on employers’ rights to terminate an employee’s employment. So many that employers should almost never rely on the at-will employment doctrine alone to justify letting an employee go.

Related Webinars:

Should We Throw Out At-Will Employment?

No. At-will employment is still a fundamental premise for the employment relationship.

If nothing else, it places the burden on the employee to prove that their employer violated their individual rights. This helps prevent meritless litigation.

But there is more. It also establishes that any employment is of an indefinite nature by default. That’s the primary reason why its important for employers to reference at-will employment in offer letters, employment contracts, and employee handbooks. Although not always necessary, reciting the at-will employment rule helps eliminate any doubt whether the employment was intended for a specific term.

How Then Is At-Will Employment a Myth?

Fair question. Why do lawyers both emphasize at-will employment and downplay it at the same time?

Basically, while it doesn’t provide much, at-will employment is still the most flexible starting point for employers.

Despite “at-will employment,” an array of employment discrimination laws now place many restrictions on reasons why employers CAN’T fire someone. But there are still a nearly infinite number of reasons why you CAN separate an employee.

Employers can further yield their discretion to end the employment relationship. This is done through contracts–typically, either employment agreements with individual employees or collective bargaining agreements with unions representing groups of employees.

One prevalent contractual limitation on employers’ power to end employment is the “just cause” or “for cause” requirement. Most employers only offer “just cause” protection when they have diminished leverage or increased motivation to satisfy the employees.

These protections are virtually automatic (though not mandatory) components of union contracts. There they are often undefined, with “cause” left to an arbitrator’s discretion.

Some employment agreements also replace “at-will” employment with “for cause” protection. These contracts (especially for higher level employees) often include a definition of what constitutes cause. However, even those definitions are sometimes relatively vague. For example, “cause” may include “poor performance” or “gross misconduct,” terms that are subject to interpretation.

Note: Many public (i.e., governmental) employees obtain constitutional, and often statutory, protections against arbitrary employment terminations. However, some categories of public employees will still default to at-will employment.

Don’t Play the At-Will Employment Card!

Even assuming an employee does technically have at-will employment, it’s risky to wave that around as the basis for discharge. You should always have a better reason than no reason!

In reality, every employer (a) has a reason and (b) knows the reason before they get rid of an employee. Pretending otherwise isn’t believable. So, if you tell the employee, “You’re employed at will, so we don’t have to tell you why you’re being fired,” they will hear, “We don’t want you to know why you’re being fired.” Some will then interpret this to mean, “We can’t tell you why you’re being fired, because it’s an illegal reason.”

So (unless, I suppose, you’re firing an employee for an illegal reason) you probably want to at least clue them into what the real reason is. Sure, there could be a situation where the specifics of a valid termination decision are confidential state secrets. But those are rare, and there’s still a way to deliver a better message than “Because . . . AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT.”

For more about ending the employment relationship, check out these webinars: Don’t Fire Me on Friday and Conducting Your Next Reduction in Force.

Commissioned Salesperson Agreements

New York Commissioned Salesperson Agreements

New York’s Labor Law requires employers to have written agreements with each commissioned salesperson they employ. Employers who don’t satisfy this requirement could run into serious problems down the road.

Who Is a Commissioned Salesperson?

The New York Labor Law uses the terms “commission salesman,” “commission salesperson,” and “commissioned salesperson” interchangeably. I think the last one sounds best, so I use it here.

The law defines the terms to mean “any employee whose principal activity is the selling of any goods, wares, merchandise, services, real estate, securities, insurance or any article or thing and whose earnings are based in whole or in part on commissions.”

But it specifically excludes employees “whose principal activity is of a supervisory, managerial, executive or administrative nature.”

The New York Labor Law also establishes alternative requirements (not discussed here) for “sales representatives” who are independent contractors rather than employees.

Required Agreements

Employers must have a written agreement with each commissioned salesperson that addresses their compensation.  Both the employer and the commissioned salesperson must sign the agreement. The employer must retain a copy of the agreement for at least three years.

The agreement must include:

  • a description of how to calculate wages, salary, drawing account, commissions, and all other money earned and payable;
  • the frequency of reconciliation for any recoverable draw; and
  • details about payment of compensation earned and payable upon termination of employment by either party.

It is the employer’s burden to ensure that the necessary document is in place. Otherwise, whatever terms the commissioned salesperson says exist will likely become binding.

Payment Frequency

Employers must pay each commissioned salesperson according to the agreed terms of employment.

Generally, this must be at least once per month and by the last day of the month following the month in which the employee earned the compensation. However, if monthly or more frequent payment of wages, salary, drawing accounts, or commissions are substantial, then the employer may pay additional compensation less frequently than once in each month. The employer must always pay at least as soon as required under the compensation agreement.

Upon written request of a commissioned salesperson, an employer must provide a statement of earnings paid or due and unpaid.

Read more about New York’s pay frequency requirements for other categories of employees.

Make Sure You Have Agreements in Place with Each Commissioned Salesperson

Ideally, employers should satisfy these requirements at the time of hire. But you may have employees who change into qualifying roles after they start. Or you might not have put everything in writing. Now is a good time to review your records to make sure you have what you need if there is ever a dispute with a commissioned salesperson over compensation.

Businesses should also periodically review their commissioned salesperson agreements. Do they still reflect the current compensation terms? If not, prepare a new agreement, and get the employee to sign it.

Don’t forget to make sure you’re also complying with the New York Wage Notice Requirements!