Tag: employee benefits

FLSA Regular Rate

U.S. DOL Clarifies FLSA Regular Rate

For the first time in over 50 years, the U.S. Department of Labor updated its interpretation of “regular rate of pay” under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The new DOL rule takes effective January 15, 2020. The changes address new, more complicated perks and benefits. These include wellness plans, fitness classes, nutrition classes, and smoking cessation classes. The new rule will make it less costly for employers to provide additional benefits to employees. This, in turn, may increase workplace morale and employee retention.

The FLSA Regular Rate

The Fair Labor Standards Act is the federal law that establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards. The FLSA covers most employees in the private sector and federal, state, and local governments.

Under the FLSA, an employee is eligible for minimum wage and overtime unless they qualify for a statutory exemption.

The employer must pay “non-exempt” employees at least minimum wage and compensate them for overtime at a premium rate of 1.5 multiplied by the employee’s “regular rate of pay” for all hours worked over 40 in a “workweek.”

Under current regulations, the “regular rate of pay” includes all remuneration for employment paid to or on behalf of an employee for hours worked, except for specific categories that were excluded under the FLSA. This “regular rate” includes the hourly wages and salaries for non-exempt employees, most bonuses, shift differential pay, on-call pay, and commission payments. The regular rate of pay is generally calculated by adding the employee’s includible compensation each week and dividing it by the number of hours worked within the workweek.

For more details on performing the FLSA regular rate calculation, read Calculating the Overtime ‘Regular Rate’.

New Rule on Regular Rate of Pay

The new rule clarifies that the following perks may be excluded from the calculation of an employee’s regular rate of pay, effective January 15, 2020:

  • The cost of providing parking benefits, wellness programs, onsite specialist treatments, gym access, and fitness classes, employee discount on retail goods and services, certain tuition benefits and adoption assistance;
  • Payment for unused paid leave, including paid sick leave and paid time off;
  • Certain penalties incurred by employees under state and local scheduling leave laws;
  • Business expense reimbursement for items such as cellphone plans, credentialing exam fee, organization membership dues and travel expenses that don’t exceed the maximum travel reimbursement under the Federal Travel Regulation system or the optional IRS substantiation amounts for certain travel expenses;
  • Certain sign-on and longevity bonuses;
  • Complimentary office coffee and snacks;
  • Discretionary bonuses (the DOL noted that the label given to a bonus doesn’t determine whether the bonus is discretionary); and
  • Contributions to benefit plans for accidents, unemployment, legal services, and other events that could cause financial hardship or expense in the future.

The DOL has also expanded the circumstances where employers can exclude call-back pay from the regular rate. Such payments no longer must go into the regular rate unless they are scheduled and prearranged.

Regular Rate Pitfalls

Overtime Must Be Calculated Weekly

Under the FLSA, an employer is responsible for determining the official workweek. Employers have considerable leeway in doing so. However, the workweek must consist of a fixed reoccurring 168 hours that contains seven, 24-hour workdays.  The workweek and workday start and end times must remain consistent unless employees receive advance notice of the changes.

Non-exempt employees must be paid overtime for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek (or as otherwise described by applicable law). Employers may not average the number of work hours worked by an employee over a two-week period, even if the employer has their payroll set up biweekly, to avoid paying overtime. For example, if an employee works 45 hours in week 1 and 35 hours in week 2, the employer may not average the hours worked over the two weeks resulting in a payment of zero overtime hours. Instead, the employee would be due 5 hours of overtime for week 1 and no overtime hours for week 2. Many employers make this mistake that could result in an extensive and expensive audit or litigation.

Employees Can’t Waive Overtime Pay

Non-exempt employees cannot waive their right to receive statutory overtime pay. This is true even for collective bargaining agreements or other written employment contracts.

Private Companies Can’t Use “Comp Time” Instead of Overtime Pay

Companies cannot provide employees with compensatory time (comp time) in exchange for payment for overtime hours worked each week. There are some exceptions to this rule for government workers.

Salaried, Non-Exempt Employees Are Still Eligible for Overtime Pay

An employer could pay a non-exempt employee a weekly salary that will represent pay for all regular hours of work. But if the employee works overtime during the workweek, the employer must pay additional premium compensation above and beyond the weekly salary for each overtime hour worked.

Example: An employee earns a weekly salary of $700 each week and works 43 hours. This employee’s regular rate of pay for this week would be $700/43=$16.28. The extra premium pay owed for the overtime hours can be determined by dividing the regular rate of pay in half. The employee should receive the normal weekly salary of $700, plus (3 hours x premium pay of $8.14) = $724.42.

State Overtime Laws

This new rule relates specifically to the FLSA. Many states have separate minimum wage and overtime laws. Employers often must satisfy both state and federal laws in this area. The “regular rate” concept may differ in some states. Therefore, be sure to consider the laws of your state in addition to the FLSA.

What Employers Should Do Next

Employers should conduct an overall audit to review what they include in their regular rate calculations. Companies using a third-party payroll provider should ask for clarification as to how overtime is calculated each week.

The FLSA is a complex law with many nuances beyond those described here. An experienced employment attorney can evaluate your pay practices and consult with you on overtime compliance. They might be able to identify alternative work schedules or payroll practices that comply with the wage and hour laws.

 

The new FLSA regular rate regulations are available here.

New York Wage Deduction Rules

New York Wage Deduction Rules

In addition to satisfying minimum wage and overtime requirements, employers are generally expected to pay employees all of the compensation they earn. In New York, businesses cannot withhold money from their employees’ wages unless expressly allowed by law. These New York wage deduction rules apply to all private employers, but not governmental entities such as municipalities and school districts.

New York Labor Law Section 193

Section 193 of the New York Labor Law says that “no employer shall make any deductions from the wages of an employee except deductions which” are either:

1. Made in accordance with any law or rule.

2. Voluntary, for the employee’s benefit, and expressly authorized in writing by the employee.

This category is limited to payments for:

  • insurance premiums and prepaid legal plans;
  • pension or health and welfare benefits;
  • contributions to a bona fide charitable organization;
  • purchases made at events sponsored by a bona fide charitable organization affiliated with the employer where at least 20% of the event’s profits are being contributed to a bona fide charitable organization;
  • United States bonds;
  • dues or assessments to a labor organization;
  • discounted parking or discounted passes, tokens, fare cards, vouchers, or other items that entitle the employee to use mass transit;
  • fitness center, health club, and/or gym membership dues;
  • cafeteria and vending machine purchases made at the employer’s place of business and purchases made at gift shops operated by the employer, where the employer is a hospital, college, or university;
  • pharmacy purchases made at the employer’s place of business;
  • tuition, room, board, and fees for pre-school, nursery, primary, secondary, and/or post-secondary educational institutions;
  • daycare, before-school, and after-school care expenses;
  • payments for housing provided at no more than market rates by non-profit hospitals or affiliates thereof; and
  • similar payments for the benefit of the employee.

“Similar Payments”

Given the detailed nature of most items in this list, it’s always hard to determine whether anything else would qualify as a “similar payment” falling into the last category.

New York Department of Labor regulations explain that to qualify as “similar payments” the benefits to the employee must fall into one of these categories:

  • Health and Welfare Benefits
  • Pension and Savings Benefits
  • Charitable Benefits
  • Representational (i.e., union) Benefits
  • Transportation Benefits
  • Food and Lodging Benefits

The regulations also state that “convenience” is not a benefit. Thus, employers may not, for example, deduct a fee for cashing an employee’s paycheck.

The DOL also expressly prohibits deductions for employee purchases of tools, equipment, and work clothes; fines or penalties for misconduct; and repayment of employer losses, such as spoilage, breakage, and cash shortages.

3. Related to recovery of an overpayment of wages due to a mathematical or other clerical error by the employer.

The New York wage deduction rules only allow employers to recover overpayments of wages if the overpayment was due to a mathematical or other clerical error. If that is the case, then the employer must satisfy a number of specific procedural requirements in order to recover the overpayment from future paychecks. This includes advance notice to the employee and an opportunity to appeal the finding that an overpayment occurred.

Click here for more on recovering overpaid wages.

4. Repayment of advances of salary or wages made by the employer to the employee.

As with the recovery of overpayments, the New York wage deduction rules establish many procedural parameters for recouping money advanced to employees.

Under these rules, an “advance” is any provision of money by the employer to the employee based on the anticipation of the earning of future wages. If the payment is contingent on interest accruing, fees, or a repayment amount higher than the money provided by the employer, then it does not qualify as an advance. Employers cannot recover such “loans” through payroll deductions.

To establish a wage or salary advance that the employer may recover through payroll deductions, the employee must provide advance written authorization.

New York Wage Deduction Rules Apply to Separate Transactions

The New York wage deduction rules also prohibit employers from requiring employees to make any payment in a separate transaction that could not be made as a pay deduction. There is an exception where a current collective bargaining agreement requires the payment.

This prohibition does not prevent employers from asking for repayment or pursuing legal remedies against their employees. For example, an employer could sue an employee for theft of property or not repaying a lawful loan. But the employer could not take adverse employment action because the employee doesn’t pay. (However, the employer could, of course, take appropriate discipline for stealing, losing company money or property, etc.)

Review Your Wage Deduction Practices

New York businesses could face substantial penalties for failing to pay wages due to employees. This includes making unlawful wage deductions. Beyond taxes and standard employee benefits, such as insurance coverages, there are few permissible deductions from wages in New York. If you have any questions in this area, please consult with an experienced employment attorney.

To receive regular updates on New York employment laws and announcements about our free webinars, please subscribe to the Horton Law email newsletter.

New York Bereavement Leave

Cuomo Vetoes New York Bereavement Leave Law

In June 2018, the New York State Legislature overwhelmingly approved legislation that would have granted paid bereavement leave rights to most employees. The measure would have changed the New York Paid Family Leave Benefits law to include bereavement leave along with the existing qualifying circumstances.

In light of extensive resistance from the business community, the Legislature did not formally deliver the bill to the Governor’s office until December. Upon receipt, Governor Cuomo vetoed the legislation ostensibly out of concern for the impact on workers.

Proposed Bereavement Leave Amendment

New York bereavement leave legislation passed the Senate by a vote of 61-1 and the Assembly 111-32.

Republican Senator Rich Funke and Democratic Assemblyman Joe Morelle sponsored the amendment. Both have lost children who were in their early thirties. Their memorandums in support of the bill stated:

“The inability to take time to process grief not only has an impact on a person’s health and their family, it has a profound impact on their ability to carry out their normal day to day tasks. However, on average, four days are allotted for the death of a spouse or child, according to the Society for Human Resource Management 2016 Paid Leave in the Workplace Survey.”

The legislation relied on additional wording in the Paid Family Leave Benefits law that took effect at the beginning of 2018. It modified the definition of “family leave” to include “leave taken for the purposes of bereavement due to the death of a family member.” The legislation also indicated that a death certificate would provide the necessary certification of eligibility for leave.

Potential Impact of Proposal

These minimal revisions to the Paid Family Leave legislation could have had extreme consequences.

Bereavement leave apparently would have been available for up to 10 weeks (increasing to 12 weeks in 2021) each year without any limitation on the timing relative to the death. Moreover, it would have been available equally regarding a broad array of family members, including grandchildren, children, spouses, parents, and grandparents. Although the New York Workers’ Compensation Board likely would have been able to issue regulations related to the new bereavement leave component of Paid Family Leave, it might have lacked authority to place further limitations on those parameters.

As the Paid Family Leave Program operates as a (primarily) employee-funded insurance benefit, employees would have had to contribute more out of their paychecks to fund the insurance premiums. As with the original Paid Family Leave categories, this long-term bereavement leave would have been difficult for the State to price effectively, potentially leading to over- (or more likely) under-funding in the first years.

Business Community Opposition

The Business Council of New York led the efforts of more than 20 prominent business groups, including many chambers of commerce, seeking Governor Cuomo’s veto of this legislation.

This consortium’s August 2, 2018 letter to the Governor’s office noted that the Legislature had rebuffed efforts to include more reasonable limits on paid bereavement leave:

“The Business Council’s recommendations for reasonable parameters on any expansion of PFL to bereavement were rejected by both the Senate and Assembly sponsor. These included limiting bereavement leave to several weeks, to be used within 180 days of a family member’s death.”

This letter also expressed concern “that the Legislature is proposing a dramatic expansion of the Paid Family Leave Act that has only been in effect for just over six months [now one year], and before any usable data is available regarding utilization or costs. Employers, the state, insurers and employees are still working to understand and implement the current law.”

Finally, these business groups noted that fully-paid bereavement leave is already a standard employee benefit, though often only for a few days; and that “Employers understand that to attract and retain the best talent available they need to be there for their employee[s] in their time of need and will continue to do so without another burdensome government mandate.”

Governor Cuomo’s Veto

Although business groups more vocally object to this legislation, Governor Cuomo publicly relied almost exclusively on supposed worker concerns in his veto message:

“Workers’ organizations such as A Better Balance have expressed significant concerns to me about this bill, and, as difficult as it is, I must heed their concerns.”

A Better Balance prides itself on having been active in supporting New York’s original Paid Family Leave law. But the organization posted a call to action on its website encouraging the Governor to veto the bereavement leave amendment. It emphasized the anticipated high costs to workers:

“Costs – entirely borne by workers – will be extremely high. Because paid family leave is 100% worker funded, this bill would impose potentially very high, uncalculated costs on New York workers—costs that will fall especially heavily on low-income workers.”

Governor Cuomo repeated that concern, while otherwise sharing some raised more specifically by the Business Council. For example, the veto memorandum notes: “Second, there is no stated limit on when leave can be taken. Unlike bonding leave, which is limited to 12 months from the qualifying event, no such limit would exist here. This drafting failure could lead to claims being made well beyond a year from death.”

The Future of New York Bereavement Leave

Employers should not expect this issue to disappear in 2019. Governor Cuomo concluded his veto message by commenting: “I am committed to working with the Legislature in the coming legislative session to resolve these issues for the benefit of hardworking New Yorkers.”

What might an alternative New York bereavement leave law look like?

New York Legislators will have to decide whether to continue to pursue bereavement leave through the Paid Family Leave Program or another path.

PFL offers the benefit of being an existing, employee-funded system. But any addition of bereavement leave must be much more narrowly drafted than it was in the 2018 legislation. The lawmakers should separately address issues such as length of leave available per death, total leave available per year, timing of leave, etc. And 10 or 12 weeks projects as an unaffordable and overly burdensome duration. The Legislature should also consider whether the same leave parameters should apply equally to small and larger employers.

The Legislature could alternatively seek to impose a mandatory paid or unpaid bereavement leave requirement outside of the Paid Family Leave Program. However, it would then be more difficult to effect an employee-paid system. Requiring employers to offer more than a couple of days of paid bereavement leave would raise significant opposition. And any requirement that small employers pay employees not to work could be financially crippling.

 

To help you keep track of this and other issues of importance to New York employers, we offer a free monthly email newsletter and periodic complimentary webinars. To receive this valuable information at no cost, enter your email address here.