Tag: COVID-19

GINA COVID-19

GINA and COVID-19

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) prohibits employers from collecting and discriminating based on employees’ genetic information. Even though most businesses aren’t conducting genetic tests on their workers, GINA has widespread workplace implications related to the COVID-19 pandemic. As companies evaluate how to move forward in an era of renewed health concerns despite the availability of vaccines, it is critical to be familiar with how GINA and COVID-19 interact.

What’s GINA?

GINA is a federal law that applies to U.S. employers with at least 15 employees. It generally prohibits the use of genetic information in making employment decisions. The law also restricts employers from requesting, requiring, or purchasing genetic information about applicants and employees.

Many overlook GINA, given its emphasis on “genetic information.” Yes, that includes actual genetic test results, for example. But, more significantly, it broadly includes employees’ family medical history.

Specifically, “genetic information” includes “the manifestation of disease or disorder in family members of the individual.”

Under GINA, “family members” include:

(1) A person who is a dependent of that individual as the result of marriage, birth, adoption, or placement for adoption; or

(2) A first-degree, second-degree, third-degree, or fourth-degree relative of the individual, or of a dependent of the individual.

Collectively, that means that an employee’s “genetic information” includes medical information about people who aren’t even related to the employee by blood. In other words, it doesn’t matter whether the employee shares any genes with the “family member.”

For more on GINA generally, click here.

COVID-19 Meets GINA

GINA limits what employers can ask about employees’ family members’ medical conditions, including COVID-19 positivity and symptoms.

Asking About Family Member Health Conditions

If your business is covered by GINA (15 or more employees), then you shouldn’t ask specifically if any of your employees’ family members have COVID-19. However, you can more generally ask whether an employee has been in close contact with anyone who tested positive or has exhibited symptoms. As the EEOC notes, asking only about contact with family members is unduly limited anyway as an inquiry about the risk of COVID-19 exposure.

Vaccine Mandate

GINA does not prevent employers from requiring their employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. However, if an employer provides vaccines to employees, the pre-vaccination screening cannot ask for information about family medical history.

Incentivizing Vaccination

The EEOC has explained that GINA does not prevent employers from offering an incentive to employees who prove that they or their family members have received a COVID-19 vaccine. According to the EEOC, “the fact that someone received a vaccination is not information about the manifestation of a disease or disorder in a family member.”

GINA could apply, however, if an employer asks questions about a family member’s medical situation in connection with a vaccination inquiry. For example, asking “why” an employee’s family member is not vaccinated could solicit medical information.

Likewise, there are GINA implications when an employer offers to provide vaccines to family members of employees. The required screening questions would inquire into information that qualifies as the employee’s family medical history. GINA would prohibit incentivizing the disclosure of this information to the employer. But if there is no incentive or requirement (from the employer) for the family member to receive the vaccination, then the employer can provide the vaccine as long as it “ensure(s) that all medical information obtained from family members during the screening process is only used for the purpose of providing the vaccination, is kept confidential, and is not provided to any managers, supervisors, or others who make employment decisions for the employees.”

Not Just GINA

Remember that GINA is far from the only law employers must heed regarding COVID-19. The Americans with Disabilities Act and similar state laws establish restrictions related to employee’s personal medical conditions. Typically, the laws don’t prohibit inquiries and mandates regarding COVID-19. But they may at least dictate parameters you should follow.

 

For more updates on dealing with COVID in the workplace, and other topics of interest to employers, sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

NY HERO Act Update Part I

HERO Act Update Part I (Webinar Recap)

On July 21, 2021, I presented a complimentary webinar entitled “HERO Act Update Part I”. For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, I’m happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, I discuss:

  • Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plans
  • Implementation
  • Future Considerations
  • and More!

All private employers with employees in New York must adopt airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plans. The deadline for this new requirement is August 5, 2021.

The New York Department of Labor has issued template plans that employers may choose to adopt. In this webinar, I walk through the model plans and offer insights for preparing your company’s plan.

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch “HERO Act Update Part I”

Most companies will simply adopt the model plan applicable to their industry. This approach makes sense for many employers. But you should be aware of the alternatives and additional issues that may arise in connection with implementing your plan.

As discussed in the webinar, additional guidance from the Department of Labor remains likely. Plus, another aspect of the HERO Act enabling employees to form workplace safety committees may impact your airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan in the future.

Overall, there are traps for the unwary business. Make sure you understand the basis for this new requirement and how it could affect your operations in the event of a future disease outbreak.

Don’t Miss Our Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter to be among the first to know when registration is open for upcoming programs!

And follow us on LinkedIn for even more frequent updates on important employment law issues.

Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plans

NYS Issues Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plans Under HERO Act

The New York Health and Essential Rights Act (NY HERO Act) requires employers to put plans in place to protect workers in the event of future infectious disease outbreaks. Although motivated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the plans are not specific to COVID. In fact, the State’s model airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plans were released on July 6, 2021–after the COVID-19 state of emergency had been lifted. Thus, while the law requires employers to adopt plans, the plans themselves will only take “effect” in the event of a future outbreak of an airborne infectious disease.

For more on the NY HERO Act generally, read:

New York HERO Act Goes Far Beyond COVID

NY HERO Act Amendments Reduce Employer Burdens

Employer Obligation

All private sector (non-government) employers in New York State must adopt an airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan by August 5, 2021.

Employers must provide a copy of their plan to all employees within 30 days after adopting the plan. After that, all new employees must receive a copy of the plan with other new-hire paperwork at the beginning of employment.

As the basis for meeting the plan requirement, employers must review the “Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Standard” and the general and industry-specific template plans.

Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Standard

The New York Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Standard applies to private employers with worksites located within the state. It only applies when the NYS Commissioner of Health has designated an airborne infectious agent or disease as “a highly contagious communicable disease that presents a serious risk of harm to the public health.” This threshold generally will not include coverage of seasonal diseases, such as the flu.

The Standard addresses two primary components:

  • Exposure Prevention Plan
  • Exposure Controls

It also discusses relevant statutory anti-retaliation protections.

Exposure Prevention Plan

Each covered employer must establish a written airborne infectious disease prevention plan. Companies can either adopt the State’s model plan for their industry or create their own plan containing all necessary elements. However, deviating from the model plan requires agreement with any union in place or “meaningful participation” of employees if there is no union.

Employers must review and update their plan as necessary, including to reflect new or modified employee assignments related to safety compliance.

A notable new requirement under the DOL’s standard compels employers to verbally review the plan (and related employee rights) with all employees. Although the wording is ambiguous, it appears this may not have to be done unless/until there is an airborne infectious disease that has been designated as presenting a serious risk of harm to public health. That designation also generally “activates” the pre-adopted airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan.

Exposure Controls

A company’s plan must address specific categories of exposure controls. Most of these elements became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic, including health screening, face coverings, physical distancing, hand hygiene, cleaning and disinfection, and personal protective equipment (PPE).

The DOL Standard includes a requirement that employers must provide recommended PPE (such as face coverings) to employees during outbreaks of airborne infectious diseases.

Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan

The Department of Labor’s model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan is reminiscent of the Department of Health’s safety plan templates from early in the coronavirus crisis. It takes the form of a largely complete document with space for employers to add various company-specific details.

In addition to the general model plan, there are industry-specific templates for:

The industry templates do not vary significantly from the general plan. The primary differences relate to the specific listing of “advanced controls during an outbreak.”

Introduction

The model plans begin with a general overview of their purpose. The introductory language notes that the plan will only be in effect when the New York State Commissioner of Health designates an airborne infectious disease as a highly contagious communicable disease that presents a serious risk of harm to the public health.

The introduction also states the applicable broad definition of “employees,” which includes even independent contractors.

Responsibilities

The “Responsibilities” section of the plan provides space for the company to identify itself, its covered worksites, and the supervisory employees who will enforce compliance with the plan.

Exposure Controls During a Designated Outbreak

This section contains most of the operative provisions of the airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan. It is further divided into two sub-sections labeled “minimum controls” and “advanced controls.”

“Minimum Controls During an Outbreak” fall into these categories:

  1. General Awareness
  2. “Stay at Home Policy”
  3. Health Screening
  4. Face Coverings
  5. Physical Distancing
  6. Hand Hygiene
  7. Cleaning and Disinfection
  8. “Respiratory Etiquette”
  9. Special Accommodations for Individuals with Added Risk Factors

“Advanced Controls During an Outbreak” include the following:

  • Elimination (of risky activities)
  • Engineering Controls, such as ventilation, disinfection systems, barriers, and premises layout
  • Administrative Controls
  • Personal Protective Equipment

Some of these sub-component categories include space for the company to specify which controls it will use.

This section concludes with a statement that the company will obtain, store, and maintain the selected controls “so that they are ready for immediate use in the event of an infectious disease outbreak.” Though the plan itself would not take effect until there is such an outbreak, it seems employers must remain prepared at all times.

Housekeeping During a Designated Outbreak

This section addresses the basic cleaning components of preventing disease spread. In essence, it notes that high-touch objects and surfaces will be cleaned more often during an outbreak than lower-touch surfaces. And employers may need to make changes to regular cleaning schedules and procedures.

Infection Response During a Designated Outbreak

This brief section of the plan directs employers to have suspected infected people leave the workplace and follow government guidance in contacting impacted individuals.

Training and Information During a Designated Outbreak

This section seems to require employers to train employees on related issues both independent of and in the event of an outbreak of an airborne infectious disease.

As a general matter, employees must be trained on:

  • Existence and location of the Plan
  • Infectious disease Standard
  • Employer policies
  • Employee rights under the HERO Act

Additional training on all aspects of the airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan is necessary in the event of an outbreak.

The model plan provides that the training will be “appropriate in content and vocabulary to your [i.e., employees’] educational level, literacy, and preferred language.”

Plan Evaluations During a Designated Outbreak

This plan section indicates that “the employer will review and revise the plan periodically, upon activation of the plan, and as often as needed to keep up-to-date with current requirements.” It then includes a blank table to fill in with any changes.

Retaliation Protections and Reporting of Any Violations

The model plan concludes with a statement prohibiting retaliation against an employee for exercising their rights under the plan. It also provides basic information about reporting violations.

What Your Company Must Do

First, you must have an airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan in place by August 5, 2021. Then, you must post it in each worksite and distribute it to employees. If you have one, you must include the plan in your employee handbook.

According to the model plans, an employer would need to provide training to employees. However, this is not a statutory obligation. So, it seems the Department of Labor has found a way to mandate training on its own. Of course, any employer can forego the model plans. And the Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Standard arguably does not require a training component until an outbreak exists. However, deviating from the model plans would necessitate negotiation with unions, if applicable, or, if not, the nebulous “meaningful participation” of employees.

Employers considering creating their own plan rather than adopting the relevant model plan should consult experienced labor and employment counsel.