Category: Workforce Trends

New York Independent Contractor Audit

Conducting a New York Independent Contractor Audit

If your business relies on independent contractors—whether in New York or elsewhere—you’ve likely heard that misclassification can lead to serious legal trouble. But for companies with individuals physically performing services in New York, the risks have only intensified in recent years. That’s why now is the time to perform a New York independent contractor audit of your existing relationships.

Why This Matters Now

New York State has significantly expanded protections for freelancers and increased its scrutiny of worker classification. With the 2024 enactment of the Freelance Isn’t Free Act and ongoing state and federal enforcement actions, it’s more important than ever to evaluate whether your independent contractor arrangements truly comply with the law.

Misclassifying an employee as an independent contractor can lead to liability for:

  • Unpaid minimum wage and overtime

  • Unpaid unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation contributions

  • Interest and penalties from tax authorities

  • Legal fees and liquidated damages in private lawsuits

  • Liability under New York’s Freelance Isn’t Free Act

In addition, enforcement efforts are increasing:

  • The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) continues to aggressively investigate misclassification claims.

  • The IRS and state/local tax authorities remain interested in employer tax compliance.

  • Private litigation and class actions are becoming more common, particularly where workers are denied benefits or final payment.

Bottom line: if someone is working in New York—physically, even remotely—your business may be subject to New York’s worker classification rules, regardless of where your headquarters or other business locations are located.

Step 1: Know the Legal Standard (It’s Not the Same Everywhere)

In New York, the legal tests for employee vs. contractor status vary depending on the law at issue. That complexity is a common pitfall for employers.

For Wage and Hour Purposes:

New York follows a multi-factor “economic realities” test, similar to the federal DOL standard. The core question: Is the worker economically dependent on the business or truly in business for themselves?

Relevant factors include:

  • The degree of control the business exercises over the work

  • The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss

  • The permanency of the relationship

  • The extent to which the work is integral to the business

  • The skill and initiative required

  • The extent of the worker’s investment in tools or equipment

No one factor is determinative. Control is important, but courts and agencies look at the totality of the relationship.

For Unemployment Insurance:

New York applies a worker-friendly test, meaning it is easier for a worker to be deemed an employee eligible for unemployment insurance. The NYSDOL looks primarily at whether the employer exercises any degree of supervision, direction, or control over the worker’s services. This includes not just direct oversight, but also indirect control, such as setting hours, assigning work, or requiring status reports.

As a result, a worker may be classified as an independent contractor for federal tax purposes under IRS standards, yet still be considered an employee for New York unemployment insurance eligibility.

For Freelance Isn’t Free Act Compliance:

Even if the contractor is properly classified, businesses must comply with New York’s new requirements for freelance contracts. For independent contractors in New York earning $800 or more, a written contract must exist, identifying payment timelines and retaliation protections.

Click here for more on New York’s Freelance Isn’t Free Act.

Step 2: Conduct an Internal Audit

An internal audit is your best defense against future liability. Start by identifying anyone providing services to your business who is not on payroll. Then, for each worker:

Conduct an Audit

1. Document the Relationship

  • Do you have a signed contract?

  • Does the contract describe an independent business relationship, with clear project-based deliverables and no guarantee of ongoing work?

  • Is the contract consistent with how the relationship works in practice?

2. Evaluate Control

  • Who sets the worker’s hours?

  • Where is the work performed?

  • Who provides tools, equipment, and software?

  • Do you require regular check-ins or approval for routine tasks?

3. Assess Economic Independence

  • Does the worker have other clients?

  • Do they advertise their services publicly?

  • Can they subcontract the work or delegate it?

4. Examine Duration and Integration

  • Has this person worked with you for years on repeat assignments?

  • Is their work central to your business function?

Red flags may include:

  • Contractors working set hours or reporting to a manager

  • Use of internal email addresses or being listed on the company website

  • Reimbursement of expenses that should be borne by the contractor

  • Prohibitions on working for other clients

In most cases, there are no single factors that are entirely determinative of the proper classification. Multiple criteria must be considered. But the presence of any of the above red flags should generally trigger further analysis.

Step 3: Address the Risks

After identifying questionable arrangements, you have a few options:

Option 1: Reclassify as an Employee

  • This may be the safest course, especially if the worker is full-time, works under close supervision, or performs a core function of your business.

  • It may also open access to benefits, improve morale, and reduce turnover.

Option 2: Restructure the Relationship

  • Limit control and supervision.

  • Update the contract to emphasize the contractor’s independence.

  • Avoid integrating the worker into your business structure (e.g., no internal email, no title).

Option 3: Continue the Relationship with Mitigation Measures

  • Require evidence of the contractor’s separate business (e.g., EIN, business insurance, W-9).

  • Educate your managers on boundaries to maintain independence.

  • Set project-based deliverables with defined scopes and deadlines.

Step 4: Consider the Impact of Remote Work

New York Remote Worker

Employers sometimes overlook that remote workers still “perform services” in a physical location—namely, wherever they are sitting with their laptop. If that’s New York, your business may need to:

  • Register for a New York employer ID

  • Comply with NY wage and hour laws

  • Withhold and remit NY state taxes and unemployment contributions

  • Follow the Freelance Isn’t Free Act if you engage independent contractors based in New York

Step 5: Train and Monitor

The law is clear: labels don’t matter—substance does.

Train your managers and HR personnel not to treat contractors like employees. Common mistakes include:

  • Directing day-to-day work

  • Including contractors in internal Slack or Teams channels unrelated to their assignment

  • Having contractors attend staff meetings or performance reviews

Monitor the relationships over time. What starts as a one-off project can evolve into an employment relationship if not carefully maintained.

Don’t Ignore This Potential Source of Serious Liability

The financial implications of improper classification depend on how many people are involved, the volume of their work, and other considerations. But it can result in fines, penalties, backpay, liquidated damages, and more. All of that adds up quickly and, in some cases, the liability can accrue to individuals, such as business owners, who may not be able to easily escape it even through bankruptcy or other business dissolution.

If you’re unsure whether your contractor relationships would withstand scrutiny from the NYSDOL, the IRS, or a plaintiff’s attorney, now is the time to act. And if you engage any freelancers in New York—whether directly or through third parties—you’ll want to ensure that your contracts and processes are updated to comply with both classification standards and the Freelance Isn’t Free Act.

Given the complexity of the applicable classification standards, consulting with an experienced employment attorney is recommended if there is any uncertainty whether someone is properly treated as an independent contractor.

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

Secretary of Labor Nominee

Trump Surprises with Proposed Secretary of Labor Nominee

In a move few saw coming, President-elect Donald Trump announced Friday that his Secretary of Labor nominee is Republican Representative Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon. Chavez-DeRemer is a politician with a track record of siding with both labor and business interests.

Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination has sparked significant attention due to her co-sponsorship of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act—a bill that would dramatically expand labor rights and weaken right-to-work laws in nearly 30 states. Her cross-aisle appeal, exemplified by support from Teamsters President Sean O’Brien and prominent Democrats like Senator Patty Murray, stands in stark contrast to Trump’s historically pro-business labor agenda.

A Bipartisan (?) Pick with Union Support

Teamsters leader Sean O’Brien lauded the choice for Secretary of Labor nominee. He noted Trump’s outreach to his union last year and framed Chavez-DeRemer as a unifying figure for workers and businesses. “Now let’s grow wages and improve working conditions nationwide,” O’Brien said, signaling optimism about the nominee’s potential impact.

Chavez-DeRemer, a former mayor of Happy Valley, Oregon, and entrepreneur in the healthcare field, lost her reelection bid earlier this month but left Congress with a distinct reputation. As one of the few GOP members to align with progressive labor goals, her nomination has already garnered praise from unions, including the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers.

Reaction from Conservatives

The announcement has provoked backlash from influential conservative groups. Americans for Prosperity, a staunchly pro-business organization, criticized the nomination, arguing it betrays Trump’s previous labor policies and risks alienating his base.

“Trump’s record on labor policy was so strong, and he didn’t flip on a single labor issue yet still improved with union voters,” said AFP’s Akash Chougule. “He completely undid that and undermined his own agenda and movement by picking a teachers union hack for Labor. Senate GOP should reject this nomination.”

Chavez-DeRemer’s pro-labor stance—embodied in her support for legislation like the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act—has drawn ire from right-to-work advocates who view her as out of step with Republican orthodoxy.

Immediate Challenges for the Department of Labor

If confirmed, Chavez-DeRemer will face several pressing issues at the Department of Labor. Among the most urgent is the long-awaited update to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) salary exemption test. The Biden administration proposed increasing the salary threshold for exempt employees—potentially expanding overtime eligibility for millions of workers. A federal court recently struck down the rule, and the new administration will have to decide whether to appeal or walk away from the rule. Business groups have expressed concern over the financial burden of such changes, while labor advocates argue that the update is long overdue to ensure fair pay for workers.

Chavez-DeRemer will also have to address broader labor market challenges, including:

  • Modernizing worker classifications to reflect the evolving gig economy, a contentious issue that pits tech companies against labor advocates.
  • Reevaluating federal regulations on independent contractors and joint employers, key concerns for both unions and businesses.
  • Enforcing compliance with labor standards while balancing business concerns about regulatory overreach.

Her ability to navigate these challenges will define the department’s trajectory under the new administration and could influence how workers and businesses view Trump’s labor policies moving forward.

What This Means for Trump’s Labor Agenda

This nomination signals a potential shift in Trump’s labor policy approach. While his first term focused on deregulation and business-friendly initiatives under Labor Secretaries Alexander Acosta and Eugene Scalia, Chavez-DeRemer’s selection could open the door to more balanced policies aimed at addressing worker concerns.

Her ability to navigate confirmation in a polarized Senate remains uncertain. However, her potential bipartisan appeal, bolstered by endorsements from unions and some Democrats, positions her as a viable, albeit controversial, choice to lead the Department of Labor.

A Nominee with a Unique Profile

Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination follows a line of Trump labor secretaries with diverse backgrounds, but her record stands apart. A Latina entrepreneur and former mayor, she combines business experience with a legislative focus on worker rights—a combination that may redefine the Labor Department’s priorities under Trump’s second administration.

Whether this move represents a new chapter in Trump’s labor policy or a temporary departure from his traditional approach, one thing is certain: Lori Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination has set the stage for a heated confirmation battle and a possible recalibration of how the federal government balances labor and business interests.

Just One Part of the Equation

Even if Chavez-DeRemer is confirmed to head the U.S. DOL, the administration will be more business-friendly. Her views are not shared with other Republicans in Congress, making pro-union or worker amendments to federal law unlikely. Plus, the National Labor Relations Board has more direct control over much of the field of employer-union relations. Through other appointments, President Trump is still likely to effect significant rollbacks from pro-labor interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act that have stifled employers during the Biden administration.

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

NYC Pet Leave

Paid Pet Leave for NYC Employees?

On October 23, 2024, a new pet leave bill was introduced before the New York City Council. The bill proposes to amend NYC’s Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA) to allow employees to use paid sick time for the care of pets. Below is a summary of the proposal and insights on what employers should consider as this legislation progresses.

Key Provisions of the Pet Leave Bill

The proposed law, introduced by Council Members Shaun Abreu and Tiffany Cabán, expands the existing NYC sick leave to include absences related to the care of “covered animals.” Here are the essential elements:

  1. “Covered Animals” includes any animal primarily kept for companionship in compliance with local laws and service animals. This ensures a broad application, covering both household pets and certified service animals.
  2. Types of Permitted Leave: Under the new law, employees could use sick leave for:
    • Medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of an animal’s physical illness, injury, or health condition.
    • Preventive medical care for the pet.
  3. Existing Sick Leave Entitlement Remains Unchanged: The law does not increase the amount of sick leave available to employees. Instead, it adds pet care to the list of permitted uses for existing sick leave hours.
  4. Effective Date: Should the bill pass, it will take effect 120 days post-enactment, giving employers some time to adjust policies accordingly.

Implications for Employers

Policy Adjustments: Employers may need to revise their sick leave policies to explicitly include pet care as a covered absence.

Employee Documentation and Requests: As with other types of sick leave, it may be necessary to establish guidelines for requesting pet leave to prevent misuse. Unfortunately, employers don’t currently have much latitude in questioning sick leave requests.

Potential Operational Impacts: New York City has a high rate of pet ownership. Thus, the potential increase in short-term absences is worth consideration, especially for roles that require continuous coverage.

Supporting Employee Well-being: This initiative reflects a growing focus on mental health and well-being in the workplace. For employees, being able to care for their pets without the fear of losing pay or facing disciplinary action could enhance morale and reduce anxiety, particularly for those who rely on their pets for companionship. Employers should look for ways to benefit from the law. Some employers already allow pet care leave voluntarily.

Potential Pet Leave Implications Beyond New York City

The proposed pet leave bill specifically amends New York City’s ESSTA. IT would not directly apply to employees outside the City. However, New York State also has a statewide paid sick leave law modeled after NYC’s ESSTA. So, this proposal could prompt consideration of similar measures at the state level. If the pet leave bill gains support and proves effective in NYC, it may set a precedent that encourages the New York State Legislature to consider a statewide extension.

Employers across the state (and country?) should monitor this proposal as its implementation in NYC might foreshadow future legislative developments. In particular, those with locations in both New York City and elsewhere should evaluate how this potential change aligns with their broader leave policies.

Next Steps for Employers

The pet leave bill is still under consideration. However, employers should proactively evaluate their current leave policies and consider how they might integrate this potential change. By staying informed and prepared, businesses can ensure they remain compliant while demonstrating that they support their employees’ diverse needs.

As this bill advances through the New York City Council, stay updated and consult legal professionals if you need further guidance. This proposed change could set a precedent for future legislation that might even expand to other aspects of employee pet ownership.

Stay tuned for updates on the passage of this law and potential best practices for implementation!

 

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.