Category: Employment Law

NYC Height & Weight Discrimination

NYC Prohibits Height & Weight Discrimination

As of November 22, 2023, the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) now includes height and weight as protected characteristics. This legislation is poised to influence similar height and weight discrimination initiatives elsewhere. Accordingly, employers throughout New York State and beyond should take notice.

Height & Weight Protected

On May 26, 2023, Mayor Eric Adams signed NYCHRL amendments that prohibit discrimination based on height and weight in employment, housing, and public accommodations.

Thus, height and weight discrimination are now prohibited in NYC, similar to the existing protections based on race, sex, and marital status (among others). Accordingly, workplace harassment based on height and weight is also unlawful.

Exemptions & Defenses

While the primary aim is to protect individuals from unfair treatment, the law acknowledges situations where height and weight requirements may be necessary.

Height or weight standards may be applied where:

  1. required by federal, state, or local law; or
  2. permitted by regulations of the Commission on Human Rights identifying specific jobs for which
    • the person’s height or weight could prevent performing essential requisites of the job requirements, with no viable alternative action that would allow the person to perform the job; or
    • consideration of height or weight criteria is reasonably necessary for the normal operations of the business.

If not expressly excepted by law or regulation, employers may also assert an affirmative defense based on either of the bulleted circumstances above. But then it is their burden to prove those elements.

Furthermore, the law clarifies that it does not prohibit employers from offering employee incentives through voluntary wellness programs that support weight management.

Implications for Employers

Employers in New York City should take proactive steps to ensure compliance with this new law, including:

  1. Reviewing Hiring Practices: Remove any references to height and weight in job descriptions unless they are demonstrably justified by business necessity.
  2. Updating Policies: Handbooks, training materials, and other policies should now include height and weight as protected categories.
  3. Sector-Specific Considerations: In industries like hospitality and retail, where customer-facing roles are common, it’s crucial to align policies with these new protections against height and weight discrimination. Notably, customer preferences are not a valid defense against height and weight discrimination claims.

Businesses in other parts of New York should also take note of this development. It has become increasingly common for the State Legislature to follow NYC’s lead in enhancing workplace protections. Indeed, a proposed bill on height and weight discrimination is pending in Albany. It would not be surprising if that became law as early as 2024.

 

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

2022 EEO-1

2022 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) opened the 2022 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection on October 31, 2023. The deadline for submissions and certifications is set for December 5, 2023.

Understanding the EEO-1 Component 1 Report

The EEO-1 Component 1 report is an obligatory annual data collection exercise for private sector employers with 100 or more employees, as well as federal contractors with 50 or more employees meeting certain criteria. This report requires the submission of workforce demographic data, including data segmented by job category, gender, and race or ethnicity.

New Resources for Filers

In an effort to streamline the data submission process, the EEOC’s Office of Enterprise Data and Analytics (OEDA) has launched a new EEO-1 Component 1 Instruction Booklet for the 2022 data collection period. This booklet consolidates various support materials, such as frequently asked questions and fact sheets, into a single resource. It also provides additional information to clarify eligibility and reporting requirements.

Enhanced Filing Process

The EEOC announced that it has enhanced the filing process by introducing self-service options and an online Filer Support Team Message Center within the EEO-1 Component 1 Online Filing System (OFS). This platform enables filers to submit requests for assistance, update requests with new information, terminate requests, and track the status of requests, thereby simplifying the filing process.

Additional EEOC Data Collections

The EEOC has also opened the 2023 EEO-4 state and local government data collection, which is also due on December 5, 2023. This mandatory data collection requires all state and local governments with 100 or more employees to submit demographic workforce data every two years. A new EEO-4 Instruction Booklet is now available to aid in this process.

Employer Compliance

All employers must determine whether they are required to file EEO data. If so, you should make sure you have the necessary data prepared in time to meet the filing deadlines. Hopefully, the new guidance resources from the EEOC will make it easier for companies to comply with the reporting process.

FLSA Exemption Threshold

DOL Proposes Increased FLSA Exemption Threshold

On August 30, 2023, the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor announced its intention to propose significant increases in the compensation required for several common minimum wage and overtime exemptions. If adopted following public review and comment, the FLSA exemption threshold for the administrative, executive, and professional exemptions would increase by more than 50% over the current salary requirement. The proposal also seeks an automatic adjustment every three years. In addition, the pay required to qualify for the FLSA’s “highly compensated employee” exemption would also increase substantially.

FLSA Minimum Wage and Overtime Requirements

The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to most employers across the United States. It generally requires that employees receive a minimum wage of at least $7.25 per hour and then receive overtime at time-and-a-half the employee’s regular rate for hours worked beyond 40 in a week. However, there are various exceptions and exemptions from those requirements.

Note that many states and some localities have additional minimum wage and overtime requirements. Employers are often subject to and must comply with both the FLSA and the applicable state/local standards.

“White-Collar” Exemptions

The FLSA permits a series of so-called “white-collar” exemptions that employers commonly rely on in structuring compensation for certain, typically non-manual, workers. The most generally applicable of these are known as the administrative, executive, and professional exemptions.

Under the FLSA, each of these exemptions has a salary basis requirement. To qualify for the exemption, an employee must be paid a salary that usually doesn’t vary based on how much the employee works in a given week.

Currently, the minimum salary for these exemptions is $684 per week ($35,568 annualized).

Proposed FLSA Exemption Threshold

The U.S. DOL has the authority to issue regulations interpreting the FLSA, including its exemptions. The salary requirement has historically been implemented through such administrative rulemaking.

The DOL has now proposed to base the salary requirement on the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers in this lowest-wage U.S. Census Region. The South is traditionally and currently the lowest-wage region.

Based on this method, the new FLSA exemption threshold would be $1,059 per week ($55,068 annualized). However, the DOL’s proposal indicates in a footnote that the actual threshold upon adoption of a final rule could be higher. Since some time will pass before the rule is finalized, the 35th percentile earnings in the South may increase. The DOL notes that given its current projection for future quarterly earnings data, the new weekly salary threshold could be up to approximately $100 higher than $1,059 upon adoption.

The proposal would also impose automatic updates to the salary requirement. The DOL would change the amount every three years to maintain the 35th percentile standard.

Highly Compensated Employee Threshold

The administrative, executive, and professional exemptions are not based solely on compensation. Employees’ duties must also meet particular standards. However, the FLSA recognizes an alternative potential exemption for some employees who do not fully meet the duty requirements of the other white-collar exemptions.

Currently, the “highly compensated employee” exemption could apply to an employee who makes a salary of at least $684 per week and overall qualifying annual compensation of at least $107,432.

As proposed, the new DOL rule would tie the overall annual compensation requirement to the 85th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally. Based on current earnings statistics, that would initially be $143,988. Like the standard exemption salary threshold, this bar would also be subject to automatic updates every three years.

Rulemaking Process

Once the DOL’s proposal is formally published in the federal register, the public will be afforded at least 60 days to submit comments. After the comment period ends, the DOL can move forward with a final rule change. The new rule could be exactly what is currently proposed or include some revisions.

Given the necessary rulemaking timeline, it is unlikely the FLSA exemption threshold would change before 2024.

Potential Litigation

The last time the DOL tried to include automatic indexing of the FLSA exemption threshold, it was challenged in the courts and ultimately never took effect. Similar lawsuits will presumably be filed in response to the DOL’s current attempt to increase the salary requirement. The outcome of those cases cannot be as reliably predicted.

Impact of Proposals

The practical impact of the potential increases will vary depending on an employer’s circumstances. Some states already have higher exemption thresholds than what the DOL seeks here. Some companies already pay most exempt employees beyond this level. Nonetheless, many would need to either re-classify employees as non-exempt or increase their salaries, potentially significantly.

Even where the initial jump to $1,059 (or more) per week is not particularly problematic, the prospect of automatic indexing could be more so. This approach would almost certainly result in meaningful increases every three years. Notwithstanding other economic factors, some employers would raise salaries to meet the new higher thresholds, putting upward pressure on average weekly wages nationwide (and perhaps especially in the South, where fewer states currently impose thresholds beyond the FLSA level). As a result, it almost necessarily will become more expensive over time to maintain these exemptions.

 

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.