Category: Employment Law

Gender Discrimination

U.S. Supreme Court Prohibits Sexual Orientation & Gender Discrimination Nationwide

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision extending employment discrimination protections to LGBTQ employees across the country. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Unlike some state employment discrimination statutes, Title VII does not expressly address sexual orientation or gender discrimination. Before this ruling, federal courts had disagreed whether Title VII’s prohibition of discrimination based on “sex” extended into those areas. The Supreme Court’s decision conclusively answers that question in the affirmative.

Case Background

The Supreme Court’s opinion came out of three separate cases involving employers who fired their employees allegedly for identifying as gay or transgender. The employees sued their employers for sex discrimination under Title VII.

In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the 6-3 majority’s opinion holding: “An employer violates Title VII when it intentionally fires an individual employee based in part on sex . . . [b]ecause discrimination on the basis of homosexuality or transgender status requires an employer to intentionally treat individual employees differently because of their sex. An employer who intentionally penalizes an employee for being homosexual or transgender also violates Title VII”. In other words, this decision generally prohibits employers from disciplining, firing, failing or refusing to hire, or otherwise discriminating against an employee (or a prospective employee) because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Majority Rationale

The Supreme Court focused on the meanings of the terms used in Title VII at the time of its enactment. The majority considered the ordinary public meaning of “sex,” finding that the term refers to the biological distinction between males and females. After establishing the applicable definition of “sex,” the Court applied the “but for” causation standard to establish if the defendant employers had violated Title VII. This standard asks whether a particular outcome would not have happened ‘but for’ the alleged discriminatory basis. In this case, the employers would not have fired the plaintiffs, “but for” the employees’ sexual orientation or transgender status. The Court held that as long as the plaintiff’s sex was the “but for” cause of the termination, it was enough to trigger Title VII liability.

Dissenting Views

The three dissenting justices relied on strict constructionist views of the definition of “sex”. Specifically, they focused on what they felt the average person would have viewed the term to mean when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964. According to Justice Alito, at that time, “[d]iscrimination ‘because of sex’ was not understood as having anything to do with discrimination because of sexual orientation or transgender status.”

Justice Kavanaugh reasoned that the Court should rely on the “ordinary meaning” rather than the “literal meaning” of “sex”. He then concluded that “discrimination because of sex” does not encompass “gender identity” or “sexual orientation” discrimination.

New York Impact

The Supreme Court ruling will not have much practical impact on employees and employers in New York. In 2016, the New York State Division of Human Rights issued regulations interpreting the protected category “sex” to include discrimination on the basis of gender identity and the status of being transgender. The regulations defined “gender identity” as “having or being perceived as having a gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior or expression whether or not that gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior or expression is different from that traditionally associated with the sex assigned to that person at birth”. Then, in 2019 the New York Human Rights Law was amended to include “gender or identity or expression” among the statutory characteristics protected from employment discrimination.

The New York State Human Rights Law had already prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation since 2003.

For more, read New York GENDA Amends Human Rights Law.

Religious Institutions

The Supreme Court discussed concerns about Title VII carveouts for religious institutions. The First Amendment bars applying employment discrimination laws “to claims concerning the employment relationship between a religious institution and its ministers”. The Court decided not to decide this issue and left the question for future cases. The decision also does not specifically resolve issues like sex-segregated bathrooms and locker rooms.

Update Your Policies

Employers subject to Title VII (most with at least 15 employees) now clearly may not take adverse employment action against an employee or a prospective employee based on their homosexuality or transgender status. If an employer discriminates based on employee’s “sex” status, including sexual orientation or transgender status, they may be liable for monetary damages. This can include lost wages, compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees, and punitive damages. Especially if your business was not already subject to state laws prohibiting these forms of discrimination, you should promptly review and update policies and training materials.

Post-Pandemic Workplace

Preparing for the Post-Pandemic Workplace (Webinar Recap)

On April 29, 2020, Julie Bastian and I presented a complimentary webinar called “Preparing for the Post-Pandemic Workplace”. For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, we’re happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, we discuss:

  • Government Reopening Plans
  • (Still) Working from Home
  • Health & Safety Issues
  • Medical Screening
  • USERRA Compliance
  • Overtime Exemptions
  • Productivity vs. Liability

The United States is starting to gradually “reopen” following coronavirus shutdowns. In this webinar, we caution that we have not yet reached the “new normal”. But businesses still must begin planning how they will return to work when allowed to do so.

We don’t anticipate a straightforward, consistent approach for any organization. Many questions remain unanswered. But it is time to start answering them and preparing to evolve as the answers change.

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch “Preparing for the Post-Pandemic Workplace”

When and how your business can reopen depends on many factors. These include where your facilities are located and what industry you’re in.

Will you screen employees coming in to work? Should you change work schedules to enhance social distancing? Might the government require you to take such actions?

Even if your business hasn’t closed or is already open, conditions continue to change.  Make sure you have a plan in place to adjust when new directives come down.

Looking ahead, it will be critical for employers to maintain good employee relations to stay ahead in these tumultuous times.  This webinar offers suggestions on how to pursue that goal and avoid costly litigation.

Don’t Miss Our Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter to be among the first to know when registration is open for upcoming programs!

And follow us on LinkedIn for even more frequent updates on important employment law issues.

Enhanced Unemployment

Enhanced Unemployment Offers Employers A New Option During Coronavirus Pandemic

Here’s a little secret. Most employment lawyers historically didn’t have to pay much attention to unemployment laws before COVID-19 came along. Employees would leave jobs and either get unemployment benefits or not, for various reasons. But new enhanced unemployment benefits under the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act have suddenly created many new legal complexities surrounding the unemployment system. Solely in the vein of making a horrible situation slightly better, the CARES Act has produced some new approaches to layoffs and work reduction that might pose unique benefits to both workers and their employees.

Another secret. Here are the main takehomes from all the words below:

  • People on unemployment get an extra $600/week until the end of July 2020.
  • The extra money doesn’t come at the expense of employers.
  • New York’s Shared Work Program is a much more attractive option than it ever has been before.

If any of these points seem interesting, please keep reading.

New York State Unemployment

Even before the CARES Act came along, unemployment has long been a fairly complicated system. But most of that complication came in the back end. It involved the details of calculating who has worked enough to receive unemployment benefits, how much they earn, and how much each employer has to pay to enable workers to receive these benefits. Luckily, the government usually handles most of that complexity–in essence, they send workers checks and send employers the bill to cover the benefits.

Although the federal government plays a role in unemployment, it’s usually in the background. Processing unemployment claims and providing compensation to workers out of a job usually falls to the states. Thus, most employers in New York, for example, make regular contributions to the state unemployment insurance system. These contributions vary depending on how many workers receive benefits credited to a particular company’s account. In other words, companies with more employees (usually former employees) who receive benefits typically contribute more to the system. (Many non-profit organizations have the option of essentially being self-insured for unemployment. If they choose to do so, these organizations can refrain from paying unemployment “taxes” and instead reimburse the State directly for the amount of any benefits received by their employees.)

New York workers who become eligible for unemployment must first file a claim with the State. Then they have to re-certify on a weekly basis. The re-certification process serves to confirm that an individual is still out of work, but is available to work and actively looking for a new job. As long as that remains true, a claimant can normally continue to receive unemployment benefits for up to 26 weeks out of a year. To keep things simple, the amount of benefits is usually equal to half of what the person made while working, up to a max of $504 per week.

CARES Act Enhanced Unemployment

Among its numerous stimulus measures, the CARES Act includes many provisions that create temporary enhanced unemployment benefits. This article isn’t going to address all of them in detail. For example, the CARES Act enables self-employed individuals to receive unemployment benefits more easily than they normally could. It also allows workers to receive unemployment beyond the standard 26 weeks in some situations. These and other enhanced unemployment benefits may be relevant to your business or its employees. But, for now, we’re going to primarily focus on other aspects of the CARES Act unemployment enhancements that will likely have a broader and more immediate impact on how companies choose to manage their workforce during the coronavirus crises.

$600 “Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation”

Perhaps the most publicized aspect of the CARES Act unemployment measures gives virtually anyone receiving unemployment benefits an additional $600 per week. This extra benefit only lasts until July 31, 2020 (technically, the week of unemployment ending before that date). But it’s still a huge expansion of standard unemployment benefits.

Remember, the NYS max unemployment benefit is normally $504 per week. That’s what someone who normally makes $1,008 or more per week would get. Now they’ll receive $1,104. Yes, even if they made less than before!

The U.S. Department of Labor has issued guidance clarifying that people receiving unemployment will get the $600 extra per week as long as they normally qualify for at least $1 of state unemployment benefits. So, for example, someone who only made $400 per week when working could now get $800 on unemployment ($200 state unemployment benefits plus the $600 federal addition).

Employees will even receive the $600 bump if they’re only receiving partial unemployment benefits. In New York, workers whose pay is cut resulting in them working less than four days in a week and earning under $504 may qualify for partial unemployment. Though usually only a small benefit of a couple hundred dollars, the extra $600, plus whatever they’re still earning from working on a reduced schedule, will often result in such employees earning way more than they regularly would.

Though they might rather be working as normal, this enhancement is at least a meaningful upgrade for individuals on unemployment.

There’s also good news for employers (beyond the peace of mind in knowing their out-of-work employees are getting more money). The federal government is paying for this extra $600/week. Under existing New York law, this means it won’t count against employers’ unemployment experience rating. But that’s only the extra $600. The standard NYS portion will still be charged to the employer as normal.

Federal Funding of Shared Work Program

New York has had a “Shared Work Program” for decades. This program allows employers to establish a plan for reducing employee hours and compensation that will also enable workers to receive some unemployment to supplement the lower wages.

Employers must apply to the State for approval under this program. To qualify, a Shared Work Plan must:

  • Reduce work hours and corresponding wages 20–60%
  • Apply only to employees who normally work no more than 40 hours per week
  • Not reduce or eliminate fringe benefits (unless also doing so for the entire workforce)
  • Cover a period of up to 53 weeks
  • Replace a layoff of an equal percentage of employees

For more, read New York’s Shared Work Program Provides a Layoff Alternative

Some companies with seasonal fluctuations in their business routinely use this program. The primary benefit for employers is that they keep their workforce intact and in touch with the company. Another feature of the program is that employees don’t have to look for alternative work despite receiving partial unemployment benefits. The idea is for them to continue working for their current employer.

Usually, the State charges the employer’s account for the unemployment benefits employees receive under the Shared Work Program. However, the CARES Act creates full federal funding for the program through the end of 2020. This funding makes the program very attractive for employers who have less work to be done, need to save money, and don’t want to lose their employees during the COVID-19 crisis.

Note: The CARES Act does not provide federal reimbursement for Shared Work benefits paid to temporary, seasonal, or intermittent employees even though such workers can participate in a Shared Work plan under New York law.

Putting It All Together

To show the value of these enhanced unemployment provisions, let’s look at an example.

Company X

Suppose a company with 50 employees has 10 management employees who still need to and are able to work full-time right now. The other 40 are hourly employees who all make $20 per hour (not realistic, but it keeps the math simple). These employees all normally work a 40-hour week. The company qualifies as an essential business, so it can continue to operate. But customer demand is down, and management wants to keep employees safe through social distancing and remote work as much as possible. Consequently, there is much less work for these 40 employees to perform.

Let’s say the company decides it only has about 800 hours of work per week for the hourly employees. That’s half of the standard 1600 hours (40 employees x 40 hours/week). It could lay off 20 of the employees and let the other 20 work full-time, or it could let everyone work 20 hours instead of 40. Assume the company expects business to pick up later this year and will again need 40 hourly employees.

If the company either lays off half of the employees or reduces everyone’s hours, the affected employees can apply for unemployment. They will all get the $600/week enhanced unemployment benefit. The employer won’t have to pay for that. But it will have to pay for the standard NYS benefits the employee will also receive. That is, those benefits will affect the company’s unemployment insurance experience rating and the UI taxes it pays.

Shared Work Program Option

But, under the Shared Work Program, the federal government will pay all of the unemployment with no charge to the employer. Here’s what that would look like:

  • Each of the 40 employees will work 20 hours
  • Employee benefits remain intact
  • The company pays each worker $400/week (20 hours x $20/hour)
  • Each employee receives $200 in standard NYS unemployment for up to 26 weeks (subject to some individual circumstances)
  • Each employee also receives $600/week in enhanced unemployment until the end of July 2020

Through July, each employee will “earn” a total of $1,200 per week for working only 20 hours! That’s $60/hour, or triple their regular hourly rate!

At the same time, the company is still only paying $20/hour and saving $200/week per employee, or $8,000 for the 40 employees.

Can Your Company Take Advantage of This Situation?

The scenario above is just one hypothetical example. The math will vary for each company looking at options to reduce labor costs during the COVID-19 pandemic. But the Shared Work Program does offer flexibility. An employer can divide up its workforce in various ways to include/exclude different employees. You can modify the hour/compensation reduction between 20 and 60% to suit your business needs.

There may also be some logistical hassles. You do have to apply for and receive approval to participate in a Shared Work Program. But it seems New York is encouraging employers to take advantage of this option and may be able to process applications reasonably quickly.

 

For more updates from our experienced labor and employment attorneys, subscribe to our email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.