Author: Scott Horton

Scott has been practicing Labor & Employment law in New York for almost 20 years. He has represented over 400 employers and authored 100s of articles and presentations and wrote the book New York Management Law: The Practical Guide to Employment Law for Business Owners and Managers. Nothing on this blog can be considered legal advice. If you want legal advice, you need to retain an attorney.

New York Healthcare Worker Vaccination Mandate

New York Healthcare Worker Vaccination Mandate

The New York State Department of Health has issued emergency temporary regulations requiring healthcare workers in various settings to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The healthcare worker vaccination mandate includes most employees of hospitals and nursing homes. Employees and other personnel of some additional healthcare facilities and programs are also subject to the mandate. Covered workers who don’t become vaccinated in time could lose their positions.

Given the emergency nature of the regulations, they are only in effect for 90 days. They will expire in late November 2021 unless extended or adopted as permanent regulations.

Covered Entities

The New York healthcare worker vaccination mandate applies to personnel working for all of the following:

  • Hospitals
  • Nursing Homes
  • Diagnostic and Treatment Centers
  • Home Health Agencies
  • Long Term Home Health Care Programs
  • AIDS Home Care Programs
  • Licensed Home Care Services Agencies
  • Hospices
  • Adult Care Facilities

Most of the above terms are more specifically defined by law or regulations.

Generally, private “doctor’s offices” are not directly subject to the vaccination mandate. However, given the array of practice arrangements, providers should carefully consider whether they are covered.

Covered Personnel

The vaccine mandate extends beyond employees of these healthcare providers.

It applies to “all persons employed or affiliated with a covered entity, whether paid or unpaid, including but not limited to employees, members of the medical and nursing staff, contract staff, students, and volunteers, who engage in activities such that if they were infected with COVID-19, they could potentially expose other covered personnel, patients or residents to the disease.”

This definition is extensive. It may allow healthcare companies some flexibility in who must receive the vaccine. However, it would seem to cover most people (other than patients/visitors) who would come into contact with anyone else.

Vaccination Requirement

Covered personnel must eventually become fully vaccinated to continue to work/participate in their healthcare positions. They must at least obtain a first dose by September 27, 2021, if they work in hospitals, or by October 7, 2021, if they work in any other covered entity.

Healthcare entities must obtain proof of documentation for each worker and retain a copy in personnel or similar files. Employers must comply with privacy requirements. For example, medical documentation must be maintained separately from general employment records under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Exemptions

The Department of Health regulations only permit a medical exception to the healthcare worker vaccination mandate. The Commissioner of Health had previously suggested a religious exemption would be available, but that was dropped.

A covered entity may excuse personnel from the vaccine requirement “if any licensed physician or certified nurse practitioner certifies that immunization with COVID-19 vaccine is detrimental to the health” of a person “based upon a pre-existing health condition.”

Healthcare companies may make any “reasonable accommodation” for workers with a medical exemption. Any exemption or accommodation must be documented in personnel records, again in compliance with applicable privacy laws.

The DOH regulations do not necessarily require companies to make exemptions or accommodations in every instance. They also don’t specify which accommodations are reasonable. These questions must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

Compliance

The regulations add requirements that covered entities must provide proof of documentation and exemptions to the Department of Health upon request. The regulations do not specify penalties for non-compliance. However, fines or potential loss of license may be possible for violations.

 

For more updates on dealing with COVID in the workplace, and other topics of interest to New York employers, sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

GINA COVID-19

GINA and COVID-19

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) prohibits employers from collecting and discriminating based on employees’ genetic information. Even though most businesses aren’t conducting genetic tests on their workers, GINA has widespread workplace implications related to the COVID-19 pandemic. As companies evaluate how to move forward in an era of renewed health concerns despite the availability of vaccines, it is critical to be familiar with how GINA and COVID-19 interact.

What’s GINA?

GINA is a federal law that applies to U.S. employers with at least 15 employees. It generally prohibits the use of genetic information in making employment decisions. The law also restricts employers from requesting, requiring, or purchasing genetic information about applicants and employees.

Many overlook GINA, given its emphasis on “genetic information.” Yes, that includes actual genetic test results, for example. But, more significantly, it broadly includes employees’ family medical history.

Specifically, “genetic information” includes “the manifestation of disease or disorder in family members of the individual.”

Under GINA, “family members” include:

(1) A person who is a dependent of that individual as the result of marriage, birth, adoption, or placement for adoption; or

(2) A first-degree, second-degree, third-degree, or fourth-degree relative of the individual, or of a dependent of the individual.

Collectively, that means that an employee’s “genetic information” includes medical information about people who aren’t even related to the employee by blood. In other words, it doesn’t matter whether the employee shares any genes with the “family member.”

For more on GINA generally, click here.

COVID-19 Meets GINA

GINA limits what employers can ask about employees’ family members’ medical conditions, including COVID-19 positivity and symptoms.

Asking About Family Member Health Conditions

If your business is covered by GINA (15 or more employees), then you shouldn’t ask specifically if any of your employees’ family members have COVID-19. However, you can more generally ask whether an employee has been in close contact with anyone who tested positive or has exhibited symptoms. As the EEOC notes, asking only about contact with family members is unduly limited anyway as an inquiry about the risk of COVID-19 exposure.

Vaccine Mandate

GINA does not prevent employers from requiring their employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. However, if an employer provides vaccines to employees, the pre-vaccination screening cannot ask for information about family medical history.

Incentivizing Vaccination

The EEOC has explained that GINA does not prevent employers from offering an incentive to employees who prove that they or their family members have received a COVID-19 vaccine. According to the EEOC, “the fact that someone received a vaccination is not information about the manifestation of a disease or disorder in a family member.”

GINA could apply, however, if an employer asks questions about a family member’s medical situation in connection with a vaccination inquiry. For example, asking “why” an employee’s family member is not vaccinated could solicit medical information.

Likewise, there are GINA implications when an employer offers to provide vaccines to family members of employees. The required screening questions would inquire into information that qualifies as the employee’s family medical history. GINA would prohibit incentivizing the disclosure of this information to the employer. But if there is no incentive or requirement (from the employer) for the family member to receive the vaccination, then the employer can provide the vaccine as long as it “ensure(s) that all medical information obtained from family members during the screening process is only used for the purpose of providing the vaccination, is kept confidential, and is not provided to any managers, supervisors, or others who make employment decisions for the employees.”

Not Just GINA

Remember that GINA is far from the only law employers must heed regarding COVID-19. The Americans with Disabilities Act and similar state laws establish restrictions related to employee’s personal medical conditions. Typically, the laws don’t prohibit inquiries and mandates regarding COVID-19. But they may at least dictate parameters you should follow.

 

For more updates on dealing with COVID in the workplace, and other topics of interest to employers, sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

NY HERO Act Update Part I

HERO Act Update Part I (Webinar Recap)

On July 21, 2021, I presented a complimentary webinar entitled “HERO Act Update Part I”. For those who couldn’t attend the live webinar, I’m happy to make it available for you to watch at your convenience.

In the webinar, I discuss:

  • Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plans
  • Implementation
  • Future Considerations
  • and More!

All private employers with employees in New York must adopt airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plans. The deadline for this new requirement is August 5, 2021.

The New York Department of Labor has issued template plans that employers may choose to adopt. In this webinar, I walk through the model plans and offer insights for preparing your company’s plan.

Don’t have time to watch the whole webinar right now? Click here to download the slides from the webinar.

Why You Should Watch “HERO Act Update Part I”

Most companies will simply adopt the model plan applicable to their industry. This approach makes sense for many employers. But you should be aware of the alternatives and additional issues that may arise in connection with implementing your plan.

As discussed in the webinar, additional guidance from the Department of Labor remains likely. Plus, another aspect of the HERO Act enabling employees to form workplace safety committees may impact your airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan in the future.

Overall, there are traps for the unwary business. Make sure you understand the basis for this new requirement and how it could affect your operations in the event of a future disease outbreak.

Don’t Miss Our Future Webinars!

Click here to sign up for the Horton Law email newsletter to be among the first to know when registration is open for upcoming programs!

And follow us on LinkedIn for even more frequent updates on important employment law issues.