Author: Scott Horton

Scott Horton has practiced labor and employment law in New York for over 20 years. He has represented approximately 500 employers, authored hundreds of articles and presentations, and wrote the book New York Management Law: The Practical Guide to Employment Law for Business Owners and Managers.

Nothing on this blog constitutes legal advice. For legal advice specific to your situation, you should consult an attorney.

2026 New York Minimum Wage

2026 New York Minimum Wage Rates

Do you know the 2026 New York minimum wage? Actually, there are different minimum wages for different parts of the state and different industries. Employers must be ready by the end of the year to meet the new requirements that apply to their employees.

The 2026 New York minimum wage rates are shaded in blue in the tables below. The changes take effect on January 1, 2026.

[Follow us on LinkedIn for frequent updates for New York employers.]

Looking for the full history and regional rates? See our
New York Minimum Wage Guide for current data and long-term trends.

Standard New York Minimum Wage

The 2026 New York minimum wage again varies by geographic location and sometimes by industry.

For most private employers, the 2026 New York minimum wage in the following chart applies. This chart also applies for non-teaching employees of public school districts or a BOCES. However, there is no New York minimum wage for other employees of public (governmental) employers (but the federal minimum wage of $7.25 still applies in those cases).

The chart also shows the 2025 rate for comparison.

General Minimum Wage Rate Schedule
Location 2025 2026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester $16.50 $17.00
Remainder of New York State $15.50 $16.00

* After 2026, future New York minimum wage increases will occur based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the Northeast Region. In other words, the minimum wage will be indexed to inflation.

We’ve created a unique minimum wage impact calculator to help you evaluate what the increase will mean for your business.

Minimum Wage for Tipped Employees in the Hospitality Industry

New York State maintains separate minimum wage rules for employees in the hospitality industry (restaurants, hotels). The base (non-tipped) minimum wage for those workers follows the general schedule above. But for certain tipped employees, employers may count a portion of gratuities toward meeting the wage requirement (the “tip credit”).

New York has distinct cash wage + tip credit schedules for two classes of tipped hospitality employees: food service workers and service employees.

Food Service Workers

food service worker is any employee who is primarily engaged in serving food or beverages to guests, patrons, or customers in the hospitality industry who regularly receive tips. This includes wait staff, bartenders, captains, and busing personnel. It does not include delivery workers.

Hospitality Industry Tipped Minimum Wage Rate Schedule (Food Service Workers)
Location 2025 2026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester $11.00 Cash / $5.50 Tip $11.35 Cash / $5.65 Tip
Remainder of New York State $10.35 Cash / $5.15 Tip $10.70 Cash / $5.30 Tip

Service Employees

The next schedule applies to other service employees. A service employee is one who is not a food service worker or fast food employee who customarily receives tips above an applicable tip threshold (which also follows schedules, not shown here).

Hospitality Industry Tipped Minimum Wage Rate Schedule (Service Employees)
Location 2025 2026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester $13.75 Cash / $2.75 Tip $14.15 Cash / $2.85 Tip
Remainder of New York State $12.90 Cash / $2.60 Tip $13.30 Cash / $2.70 Tip

Overtime Threshold

Alongside minimum wage increases, the salary thresholds for New York’s executive and administrative exemptions from overtime also rise effective January 1, 2026. These state thresholds are above the federal FLSA threshold of $684/week.

There is no salary requirement for New York’s professional exemption. However, employers must also satisfy the FLSA threshold for most professional employees. Doctors, lawyers, and teachers do not have a salary requirement for exemption.

Executive & Administrative Exemption Weekly Salary Threshold Schedule
Location 2025 2026
NYC, Long Island, & Westchester $1,237.50 $1,275.00
Remainder of New York State $1,161.65 $1,199.10

Prepare Now for the 2026 New York Minimum Wage

New York employers should begin reviewing and updating their compensation plans now to comply effective January 1, 2026.

You may need to:

  • Increase hourly wages for employees currently near or below the new rates;
  • Adjust the cash wage component for tipped employees (ensuring the tip credit is properly applied);
  • Review exempt classifications to ensure salaries meet the new thresholds; and
  • Reclassify some employees from exempt to nonexempt if their salary will not satisfy the new requirement.

And remember: the 2026 New York minimum wage rates are only the next step. Starting in 2027, minimum wage increases are projected to be tied to inflation (via CPI-W) unless an “off-ramp” is triggered.

To stay current on New York and federal wage-hour developments and broader employment law issues, you can sign up for our email newsletter or follow us on LinkedIn!

New York Unemployment Benefits

New York Unemployment Benefits Increase in October 2025

Beginning in October 2025, New York will substantially increase the maximum weekly unemployment benefit. It will jump from $504 to $869. The elimination of the state’s long-standing federal debt from the unemployment insurance trust fund made the move possible. With the debt finally repaid, benefit levels that had been frozen for more than a decade are now being adjusted upward in one move.

For unemployed workers, this increase provides a stronger safety net. For employers, however, it means that the potential cost of unemployment claims will rise considerably, especially for employees whose wages already placed them near the old benefit ceiling.

Financing Changes to the System

As part of the same policy shift, New York has announced that the Interest Assessment Surcharge—an extra cost that employers have been paying for years to cover interest on the trust fund debt—will go away. At the same time, the state plans to increase the taxable wage base in 2026 to help rebuild the trust fund’s reserves. When the taxable wage base increases, employers pay unemployment taxes on a larger portion of each employee’s wages. Thus, even with declining 2026 rates, employers could still see higher UI costs since more wages are subject to tax.

What This Means for Employers

The most immediate impact for employers is greater exposure when employees file claims. A discharge or layoff that previously resulted in benefits capped at $504 per week will soon trigger payments of up to $869 per week. Employers that experience high turnover, seasonal layoffs, or workforce reductions will notice this difference most quickly.

The longer-term effects are tied to the financing structure. The elimination of the surcharge is welcome, but the higher taxable wage base could offset some of that benefit. Payroll and HR teams will need to pay close attention to their unemployment contribution rates when 2026 arrives. Both the rate and the base will factor into actual liability.

Try the interactive calculator we’ve built to see your potential unemployment insurance exposure under the new rules.

New York Unemployment Benefits Increasing

Preparing for the Change

Employers should take time now to assess how these changes will affect their operations. Finance and HR leaders may want to model the cost of separations under the new maximum benefit. Doing so will ensure that workforce planning and budgeting accurately reflect the higher exposure. Companies that offer severance should also consider whether more generous unemployment benefits may influence employee expectations in separation negotiations.

While the October 2025 increase purports to modernize New York’s unemployment system, it creates very real financial considerations for businesses. Taking steps now to understand and plan for those changes will reduce the likelihood of surprises once the new benefit levels take effect.

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.

Negotiating Union Contracts

Negotiating Union Contracts in a High-Inflation Economy

Although inflation has cooled from its 2022–23 peak, it remains a defining factor at the bargaining table. Workers feel the cumulative effects of rising prices over the past several years. At the same time, employers face higher labor costs, escalating healthcare expenses, and demands for greater flexibility around where and how employees work. For employers with unionized workforces, these challenges are amplified. Negotiating union contracts is no longer just about splitting the difference on wage percentages—it is about balancing long-term financial stability with short-term employee expectations, preserving operational control while accommodating workplace changes, and finding creative ways to deliver value without locking in commitments that may become unsustainable if the economy shifts again.

This article offers employers practical strategies for negotiating union contracts in a high-inflation environment, focusing on three of the most contentious issues: wages, healthcare costs, and remote-work arrangements.

Inflation and Collective Bargaining

Inflation directly drives bargaining pressure. When the cost of groceries, housing, and transportation goes up, employees expect their wages to rise at least enough to maintain their standard of living. Unions will highlight members’ real-wage erosion and push for agreements that provide protection against continued volatility.

Employers have been here before. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, when inflation often hit double digits, cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) clauses became widespread in union contracts. As inflation moderated in the 1990s and 2000s, most employers phased out automatic COLAs, viewing them as too unpredictable and costly to maintain. Now, with inflation stabilizing but still running above the Federal Reserve’s 2-percent target, unions are again pressing for some form of inflation protection.

When preparing economic proposals, employers should:

  • Model affordability over the life of the agreement: Do not just budget year-to-year; understand what a multi-year wage pattern will cost when layered with healthcare, overtime, pensions, and roll-up effects.

  • Benchmark against industry peers: Unions will bring comparables to the table. Employers should know where they stand and avoid commitments that dramatically exceed local or industry norms.

  • Avoid long-term overcommitments: Be cautious with front-loaded increases or open-ended COLA clauses. What feels manageable today can become a liability if the economy slows and competitors are not living with similar terms.

Structuring Wage Increases

There is no one “right” way to build wage proposals, but employers should consider the following tools when negotiating union contracts:

  • Multi-year structures: Contracts can front-load or back-load increases. Front-loading provides workers with immediate relief but may leave employers paying above-market wages if inflation falls. Back-loading defers costs but risks resentment if inflation stays elevated. Many employers blend the two approaches, offering a strong first-year increase followed by smaller annual raises.

  • COLA triggers with caps: Rather than reinstating open-ended COLA provisions, employers can negotiate limited formulas. For example, wages could increase by a fraction of CPI, subject to a maximum percentage each year. This acknowledges inflation without handing over full control of wage growth to external forces.

  • Lump-sum bonuses: One-time payments can provide meaningful cash to employees without permanently raising base wages or compounding overtime, pension, and other benefit costs. Employers should, however, expect pushback from unions that prefer base-building increases for long-term earnings stability.

  • Tiered or differentiated increases: Wage increases can depend on seniority, skill level, or job classification. This can be a way to reward critical skills or long-service employees while moderating costs elsewhere. But employers should watch for morale issues and potential legal risks if disparities are too wide.

In every case, employers must ensure compliance with wage-and-hour rules, including minimum wage and overtime requirements under federal and state law. A wage package that looks good on paper can create compliance problems if it doesn’t account for legal requirements.

Managing Healthcare Costs When Negotiating Union Contracts

Healthcare costs are a perennial concern, and they are often one of the toughest issues in negotiating union contracts, especially in today’s environment of rising claims and specialty drug expenses. Employers are projecting annual cost increases well above general inflation. Unions know this and will often resist cost-shifting measures, framing them as benefit reductions rather than necessary adjustments.

Practical approaches include:

  • Employee cost sharing: Adjusting premium contributions, deductibles, or copays spreads costs more evenly. Employers should pair these adjustments with clear messaging that changes are designed to preserve overall benefit levels, not cut them.

  • Plan design changes: Options such as high-deductible plans, spousal surcharges, or dependent eligibility audits can provide meaningful savings. These changes, however, must be bargained carefully and communicated clearly to avoid perceptions of unilateral takeaways.

  • Wellness and preventive programs: Initiatives that encourage healthier lifestyles can reduce utilization over time. Framed correctly, these programs can be seen as joint investments in employee well-being.

  • Reserve funds or cost-sharing formulas: Some employers negotiate contract language that sets aside reserves or defines how future spikes will be shared. This can reduce conflict down the road when costs inevitably rise.

Employers should remember that health benefits are a mandatory subject of bargaining. Unilateral changes—even well-intended—can lead to grievances or unfair labor practice charges.

Negotiating Union Contracts - Looking at health insurance information.

Remote Work and Flexibility

Remote work has emerged as one of the most complex bargaining issues since the pandemic. For many employees in relevant positions, the ability to work from home is now viewed as a standard benefit, not a temporary privilege. Unions may seek to embed remote-work guarantees in contracts.

Employers, however, must think carefully before committing. Remote work implicates productivity, supervision, safety, and even cybersecurity. Once written into a CBA, these arrangements can be hard to adjust.

Strategies for handling remote-work demands while negotiating union contracts include:

  • Pilots with sunset clauses: Agree to trial programs with defined end dates. This allows both sides to evaluate productivity and employee satisfaction without permanent commitments.

  • Clear management-rights language: Preserve employer discretion over work locations. Where possible, limit contract language to procedures (such as how requests will be considered) rather than entitlements.

  • Distinguish accommodations from entitlements: ADA or state law may require remote work as a disability accommodation in some cases. Those obligations should be addressed separately, not written into the collective agreement as universal rights.

Handled carefully, remote-work provisions can be structured in a way that provides employees with flexibility while ensuring employers retain control over core operational decisions.

Remote Work

Leaving Room to Adapt

In high-inflation environments, union proposals tend to be more ambitious. Employers need mechanisms that provide flexibility over time:

  • Side letters or MOUs: Use these for experimental provisions. They provide flexibility to test new ideas without locking them into the core agreement.

  • Reopener clauses: Tie reopeners to inflation thresholds, healthcare cost increases, or legislative changes. This ensures that both sides can revisit the contract if conditions change dramatically.

  • Strong management-rights clauses: Explicitly protect employer discretion on operations, staffing, technology, and scheduling. These clauses become especially valuable when economic conditions shift mid-contract.

  • Non-economic benefits: Consider creative alternatives—training, scheduling input, vacation flexibility—that can be highly valued by employees without carrying heavy ongoing costs.

Employers should also pay close attention to past practice and industry comparables. Arbitrators frequently rely on these benchmarks when interpreting disputed contract terms.

Practical Approaches to Negotiating Union Contracts at the Table

The bargaining process itself can shape outcomes as much as the proposals on the table. Employers should:

  • Be transparent but strategic: Share enough financial context to build credibility, but avoid “opening the books” in ways that limit flexibility later.

  • Prepare detailed costing models: Understand the true cost of each proposal, including wage roll-ups, overtime, and pension implications. A one-percent wage increase often costs far more than one percent once these effects are included.

  • Use interest-based bargaining where appropriate: Focusing on mutual interests—such as stability, recruitment, and sustainability—can sometimes open the door to creative solutions that meet both parties’ needs.

  • Stay consistent and credible: Bargaining is as much about trust as economics. If management develops a reputation for following through on commitments and maintaining consistent positions, unions are more likely to engage constructively.

For employers, negotiating union contracts during high inflation requires not only careful costing but also a clear communication strategy that builds credibility with both union leaders and employees.

Conclusion

High inflation creates challenges for both sides of the bargaining table when negotiating union contracts. Unions want to protect members’ purchasing power; employers must guard against unsustainable cost growth. But with careful planning, creativity, and a willingness to use flexible tools, employers can negotiate agreements that provide meaningful improvements without jeopardizing financial stability.

The most effective strategies combine structured wage proposals, proactive healthcare cost management, cautious approaches to remote work (where applicable), and adaptive bargaining mechanisms such as side letters and reopeners. Employers who enter negotiations prepared, consistent, and transparent are best positioned not only to reach agreements in this inflationary environment, but also to build stronger long-term labor relationships.

For more employment law updates, sign up for the Horton Management Law email newsletter and follow us on LinkedIn.