A December 16, 2019 NLRB decision reinstated employers’ discretion to maintain confidentiality in workplace investigations. In 2015 the federal Labor Board had found that employees’ rights to communicate with each other generally trumped company secrecy in this area. The new ruling allows investigatory confidentiality to be the default, rather than the exception.
Previous Standard
In 2015, an Obama-era NLRB panel with a Democrat majority held companies to the burden of demonstrating a specific need for confidentiality regarding a particular investigation. In other words, the default was the employers could not force employees to keep quiet about an ongoing internal inquiry.
Under the Banner Estrella Medical Center ruling, employers could only require confidentiality upon affirmative evidence that:
- witnesses need protection;
- evidence is in danger of destruction;
- testimony is in danger of fabrication; or
- there is a need to prevent a cover-up.
In that decision, the Board found that, absent these factors, employees’ rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act outweighed company interests in preserving the integrity of an investigation. Section 7 of the NLRA protects employees who engage in concerted activity for their mutual aid and protection regarding terms and conditions of employment.
Concern with Lack of Confidentiality
A strenuous critique of the Banner Estrella Medical Center decision was that it was inconsistent with EEOC guidance encouraging confidentiality in workplace investigations. Specifically including investigations of sexual harassment, the EEOC has long emphasized that employer procedures for resolving internal complaints “should ensure confidentiality as much as possible. . . .”
Over the past few years, the EEOC and NLRB have attempted to reconcile their inconsistent stances. The new NLRB position eliminates the conflict between these federal agencies.
Changing the Presumption (Back)
The NLRB’s 3-1 decision in a case involving Unique Thrift Store once again permits employers to ask their employees to keep investigations confidential. They can do so as the default, without first evaluating prescribed criteria.
Unique Thrift Store maintained the following work rules for employees:
- “Reporting persons and those who are interviewed are expected to maintain confidentiality regarding these investigations.”
- “The following list . . . are examples of behaviors that . . . may lead to disciplinary action, up to and including termination . . . . Refusing to courteously cooperate in any company investigation. This includes, but is not limited to, unauthorized discussion of investigation or interview with other team members . . . .”
The Board majority overruled the Banner Estrella standard, in part, for its failure “to consider the importance of confidentiality assurances to both employers and employees during an ongoing investigation.”
Open Question on Investigatory Confidentiality Rules
The NLRB’s 2019 Unique Thrift Store decision didn’t actually determine whether the above rules are lawful. The Board withheld ultimate judgment in that regard because the rules themselves weren’t clearly limited to the duration of an investigation. In other words, they arguably required employees to keep quiet even after the company had completed its investigation.
The Board did not feel it had enough information to evaluate whether Unique Thrift Store had sufficient justification for requiring post-investigation confidentiality. So, it sent the case back down for further proceedings regarding that question.
Impact on Employers
Under this new ruling, companies can go back to directing employees to maintain confidentiality during an investigation. They can generally implement and enforce written rules to that effect. But they should be careful in the wording of such rules and directives. Requiring employees to stay silent even after an investigation has concluded may be more problematic. In that situation, your company should evaluate the specific circumstances and, ideally, consult with an experienced labor attorney.
Receive more updates on labor and employment law from Horton Law PLLC. Follow us on LinkedIn or subscribe to our free email newsletter.
Click for the full decision in:
Apogee Retail LLC d/b/a Unique Thrift Store, 368 NLRB No. 144 (2019)
Banner Health System d/b/a Banner Estrella Medical Center, 362 NLRB 1108 (2015)